Family Law

Adjudication in Religious Family Laws Cultural Accommodation, Legal Pluralism, and Gender Equality in India

By Gopika Solanki
Cambridge University Press February 2013

Specifications

ISBN-13
9781107610590
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Publication
February 2013
Format
Paperback , 438 pages
Jurisdiction
India ? Countri(es) for reference only

Details

This book argues that the shared adjudication model in which the state splits its adjudicative authority with religious groups and other societal sources in the regulation of marriage can potentially balance cultural rights and gender equality. In this model the civic and religious sources of legal authority construct, transmit and communicate heterogeneous notions of the conjugal family, gender relations and religious membership within the interstices of state and society. In so doing, they fracture the homogenized religious identities grounded in hierarchical gender relations within the conjugal family. The shared adjudication model facilitates diversity as it allows the construction of hybrid religious identities, creates fissures in ossified group boundaries and provides institutional spaces for ongoing intersocietal dialogue. This pluralized legal sphere, governed by ideologically diverse legal actors, can thus increase gender equality and individual and collective legal mobilization by women effects institutional change.

• An original and far-reaching work, theoretically sophisticated while also solidly grounded in extensive first-hand ethnographic research

• Unique in its multi-faceted approach and presents conclusions which contradict much of the 'received wisdom'

• Addresses questions that are not only of theoretical interest to specialists in the field, but that also have practical policy implications

Table of Contents

List of Figures
xvii
List of Tables
xix
Preface
xxi
Acknowledgments
xxv
Abbreviations
xxix
Glossary
xxxi
1             Introduction
1
Who Shall Govern the Family? Outlining Two Approaches
5
Research Questions
9
Case Selection
9
A General Outline of the Developments in the Indian Case
11
The Study in the Indian Context
24
The Context of Inquiry
25
Research Site
29
Methods
29
Feminist Deliberations
31
Sampling in State Courts
32
Data Collection in State Courts
34
Sampling and Data Collection in Informal Courts
35
Organization of the Book
37
2.            The Shared Adjudication Model: Theoretical Framework and Arguments
41
Introduction
41
Theoretical Framework: State-Society Interactions at the Interface of Personal Laws
42
Arguments
49
The Indian Model: Juristic Diversity in the Legal Landscape
50
Formal Legal Organizations and Actors: The Lower Courts
51
Legal Organizations and Actors in Society: An Overview of Typologies, Structures, and Functions
52
Formal Organizations
52
The Doorstep Courts – Informal Associations, Groups, and Networks
55
Individual Legal Actors
55
Interactions between State and Societal Organizations and Actors
56
The Question of Legal and Extralegal Authority and Accountability
56
An Open-Ended Conception of State-Society Relations among Heterogeneous Legal Actors
60
The Paradoxical Movement between State Laws and Societal Laws
60
The Centralization of Law in the Formal Legal System
61
Fragmentation and Societalization of Law in State Courts
63
Centralization of Law in Informal Legal Forums
64
The Decentralization of Law in Society
65
Characterizing the Legal Landscape: Legal Flexibility, Fragmentation, and Change
66
Dispelling Myths about Contesting Areas in Hindu and Muslim Personal Laws: Not So Different After All?
66
Balancing Cultural Accommodation and Gender Justice
68
Normative Heterogeneity and Cultural Accommodation: Making and Unmaking Religious Communities, the Conjugal Family, and Gender
69
Preventing the Ossification of the Boundaries of Religious Groups
69
Accommodating Intragroup Difference and Facilitating Intersocietal Dialog
70
Making and Unmaking the Conjugal Family
72
Hindu and Muslim Personal Laws and the Question of Gender Equality
74
Conceiving Agency and Its Limit
78
The Agency of Litigant Women
78
Individual Women’s Agency: Forum Switching and Gender Justice
79
Structural Change through Individual Agency: Hindu and Muslim Women Litigants and Changes in Personal Laws
80
Envisaging Legal Change through Collective Socio-Legal Processes
82
Women’s Transformative Collective Agency in Contouring the Socio-Legal Processes in Society
83
Women’s Transformative Collective Agency: Everyday Processes of Adjudication and Visions of Change
85
The Question of Gender Equality in the Shared Adjudication Model
88
Conclusion
89
3.            State Law and the Adjudication Process: Marriage, Divorce, and the Conjugal Family in Hindu and Muslim Personal Laws
91
Introduction
91
The Functioning of the Family Court
92
An Overview of Cases Filed in the Family Court
95
The Disposal of Cases in the Family Court
97
The Nature of Justice in the Family Court: Consensual Rather than Adversarial?
100
Adjudication in Hindu and Muslim Personal Laws
104
Determining “Marriage” – Outlining Boundaries of the Community, Protecting Individual Rights
104
Void and Voidable Marriages: Streamlining Family Laws and Protecting Individual Rights
109
The Provision of Restitution of Conjugal Rights and the Standardization of Hindu and Muslim Personal Laws
114
The Regulation of Polygyny under Hindu and Muslim Personal Laws
116
Divorce in Hindu and Muslim Personal Laws
120
Divorce under Muslim Personal Law: The Debate over Triple Talaq
131
Divorce under Muslim Personal Law: Issues in Statutory Divorce
137
Women and Property in Marriage and Divorce Laws
139
Legal Provisions Applicable to Hindu and Muslim Women under State Laws
139
Maintenance and Alimony under Hindu Personal Law
141
Muslim Women’s (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986
145
Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC
151
Implementation of Maintenance Orders
158
Injunction for Property
162
Negotiating the Retrieval of Stridhan
168
Conclusion
172
4.            Making and Unmaking the Conjugal Family: The Administration of Hindu Law in Society
175
Introduction
175
Caste Formation and Lawmaking among Meghwals
177
Migration to Mumbai and the Statist Construction of the “Caste”
178
Nationalist Movement, Naming the Community, and Attempts at Lawmaking
181
Exposure to Democratic Politics, Creating Structures of Governance, Constructing Identity through Laws
184
Democratizing Panchayats,Civic Awareness, and Law Reforms: From the Panch System to the Panchayat
187
Attempts at Repoliticization and the Conflict over Caste Constitution
189
The Decade of the 1990s: Consolidating the Caste Identity, Social Regulation, and Lawmaking
192
Summary of the Constitutional Provisions: Commonalities, Continuities, and Discontinuities
195
The Gendered Sphere among the Meghwals
198
Innovative Legal Process: Democratic Participatory Justice
200
Structure and Organization of the Meghwal Caste Panchayat
202
Process of Adjudication in the Meghwal Caste Panchayat and the Provision for Appeal
202
Similarities, Dissimilarities, and Hybridity in State Law and Nonstate Law
203
Who Is a Hindu, Who Is a Meghwal?
203
Consent
205
Differing Conceptions of Marriage and Divorce: Marriage as Fixed or Fluid?
209
Validity of Marriage
211
Procedural Aspects of Defining Valid Marriages
212
Divorce in Caste Laws
213
Economic Rights within Marriage and upon Divorce
216
Interactions between Diverse Societal Organizations and Actors
218
Contestations among Informal Legal Actors
218
Women’s Organizations as Informal Forums of Justice: Implementing State Law without Litigation
220
Women’s Organization as Moral Watchdogs: Women’s Organizations and Caste Authorities
221
Bargaining for Women’s Rights vis-à-vis the State and the Caste
222
The Caste Panchayat among the Sai Suthars
224
Internal Governance of Family Matters among the Sai Suthars
224
The Gendered Sphere among the Sai Suthars
227
Fragmented Caste Panchayat and the Adjudication of the Family within the Caste
229
The Caste Is the Public Sphere and the State Private
231
In the Shadow of State Law and Courts
232
Justice through “Other Means”
232
Women’s Experiences in State Courts
233
Dual Patriarchies of the Family and the State
234
Struggles for Legal Autonomy in Family Matters among the Kutchi Visa Oswals (KVOs)
237
The KVOs and the History of Migration to Mumbai
238
Forming a Panchayat
239
Family, Capital, and Religio-Cultural Organization
242
Gendered Sphere within the Caste
244
Protecting the Good Woman: Denial of Divorce in the Family Court
245
Rubber-Stamping Informal Settlements
247
Social Movement around Marriage and Divorce – Reaction to State-Led Reforms
251
State-Society Encounters in Law: Comparison of Caste-Based Legal Forums
252
Other Societal Legal Bodies: Women’s Organizations
254
Legal Actors in Society: Notaries, Lawyers, Middlemen
259
Leveraging Authority: Strongmen and Political Parties in the Adjudication of Hindu Law in Society
261
Conclusion
265
5.            Juristic Diversity, Contestations over “Islamic Law,” and Women’s Rights: Regulation of Matrimonial Matters in Muslim Personal Law
267
Introduction
267
The Nature of Muslim Personal Law and the Classification of Legal Actors and Institutions in Societal Arena
268
Individual Legal Actors and “Private” Divorce
269
Interlawyer Negotiations
273
The Clergy
274
Strongmen
276
Organized Legal Bodies, Doorstep Courts, and Processes of Adjudication
278
The Administration of Muslim Personal Law in the Dar ul Qaza
278
Residential Committees
281
Civil Society and the Administration of Muslim Personal Law
284
The Doorstep Courts
290
Dispute Resolution among Organized Sects: The Khojas
292
Sociopolitical Changes in the Community between the 1950s and the 1990s
295
Family Laws among the Ithana Ashari Khojas
296
Interaction with Other Forums
298
The Question of Representation: Who Represents the Community?
300
Divergent Opinions on the Establishment of Religious “Courts”
302
Conflict and Convergence between Statutory Muslim Personal Law and Societal Laws
303
Agency and Its Constraints: Muslim Women’s Rights in the Legally Plural Sphere
312
The Campaign around Nikahnama: Reforms from Within
316
Competing Ideologies and Interests among Socio-Legal Actors and Institutions
320
Conclusion
323
6.            Conclusion
325
What Factors Would Bring About a Change in This Model?
333
The Shared Adjudication Model Compared to Other Proposals for Accommodating Communities and Ensuring Gender Equality
335
Discussing Law Reform in Personal Laws
343
Conclusion
346
Appendix      Appendix
349
Bibliography
351
Index
387

About the Author

Gopika Solanki
Carleton University, Ottawa

Out of stock
This title is currently unavailable for purchase.
  • Free HK shipping over HK$1,000
  • International shipping to 35+ countries

Recommended

You may also be interested in these books:

More titles from Family Law

View all