|
List of Figures
|
xvii
|
|
List of Tables
|
xix
|
|
Preface
|
xxi
|
|
Acknowledgments
|
xxv
|
|
Abbreviations
|
xxix
|
|
Glossary
|
xxxi
|
|
1 Introduction
|
1
|
|
Who Shall Govern the Family? Outlining Two Approaches
|
5
|
|
Research Questions
|
9
|
|
Case Selection
|
9
|
|
A General Outline of the Developments in the Indian Case
|
11
|
|
The Study in the Indian Context
|
24
|
|
The Context of Inquiry
|
25
|
|
Research Site
|
29
|
|
Methods
|
29
|
|
Feminist Deliberations
|
31
|
|
Sampling in State Courts
|
32
|
|
Data Collection in State Courts
|
34
|
|
Sampling and Data Collection in Informal Courts
|
35
|
|
Organization of the Book
|
37
|
|
2. The Shared Adjudication Model: Theoretical Framework and Arguments
|
41
|
|
Introduction
|
41
|
|
Theoretical Framework: State-Society Interactions at the Interface of Personal Laws
|
42
|
|
Arguments
|
49
|
|
The Indian Model: Juristic Diversity in the Legal Landscape
|
50
|
|
Formal Legal Organizations and Actors: The Lower Courts
|
51
|
|
Legal Organizations and Actors in Society: An Overview of Typologies, Structures, and Functions
|
52
|
|
Formal Organizations
|
52
|
|
The Doorstep Courts – Informal Associations, Groups, and Networks
|
55
|
|
Individual Legal Actors
|
55
|
|
Interactions between State and Societal Organizations and Actors
|
56
|
|
The Question of Legal and Extralegal Authority and Accountability
|
56
|
|
An Open-Ended Conception of State-Society Relations among Heterogeneous Legal Actors
|
60
|
|
The Paradoxical Movement between State Laws and Societal Laws
|
60
|
|
The Centralization of Law in the Formal Legal System
|
61
|
|
Fragmentation and Societalization of Law in State Courts
|
63
|
|
Centralization of Law in Informal Legal Forums
|
64
|
|
The Decentralization of Law in Society
|
65
|
|
Characterizing the Legal Landscape: Legal Flexibility, Fragmentation, and Change
|
66
|
|
Dispelling Myths about Contesting Areas in Hindu and Muslim Personal Laws: Not So Different After All?
|
66
|
|
Balancing Cultural Accommodation and Gender Justice
|
68
|
|
Normative Heterogeneity and Cultural Accommodation: Making and Unmaking Religious Communities, the Conjugal Family, and Gender
|
69
|
|
Preventing the Ossification of the Boundaries of Religious Groups
|
69
|
|
Accommodating Intragroup Difference and Facilitating Intersocietal Dialog
|
70
|
|
Making and Unmaking the Conjugal Family
|
72
|
|
Hindu and Muslim Personal Laws and the Question of Gender Equality
|
74
|
|
Conceiving Agency and Its Limit
|
78
|
|
The Agency of Litigant Women
|
78
|
|
Individual Women’s Agency: Forum Switching and Gender Justice
|
79
|
|
Structural Change through Individual Agency: Hindu and Muslim Women Litigants and Changes in Personal Laws
|
80
|
|
Envisaging Legal Change through Collective Socio-Legal Processes
|
82
|
|
Women’s Transformative Collective Agency in Contouring the Socio-Legal Processes in Society
|
83
|
|
Women’s Transformative Collective Agency: Everyday Processes of Adjudication and Visions of Change
|
85
|
|
The Question of Gender Equality in the Shared Adjudication Model
|
88
|
|
Conclusion
|
89
|
|
3. State Law and the Adjudication Process: Marriage, Divorce, and the Conjugal Family in Hindu and Muslim Personal Laws
|
91
|
|
Introduction
|
91
|
|
The Functioning of the Family Court
|
92
|
|
An Overview of Cases Filed in the Family Court
|
95
|
|
The Disposal of Cases in the Family Court
|
97
|
|
The Nature of Justice in the Family Court: Consensual Rather than Adversarial?
|
100
|
|
Adjudication in Hindu and Muslim Personal Laws
|
104
|
|
Determining “Marriage” – Outlining Boundaries of the Community, Protecting Individual Rights
|
104
|
|
Void and Voidable Marriages: Streamlining Family Laws and Protecting Individual Rights
|
109
|
|
The Provision of Restitution of Conjugal Rights and the Standardization of Hindu and Muslim Personal Laws
|
114
|
|
The Regulation of Polygyny under Hindu and Muslim Personal Laws
|
116
|
|
Divorce in Hindu and Muslim Personal Laws
|
120
|
|
Divorce under Muslim Personal Law: The Debate over Triple Talaq
|
131
|
|
Divorce under Muslim Personal Law: Issues in Statutory Divorce
|
137
|
|
Women and Property in Marriage and Divorce Laws
|
139
|
|
Legal Provisions Applicable to Hindu and Muslim Women under State Laws
|
139
|
|
Maintenance and Alimony under Hindu Personal Law
|
141
|
|
Muslim Women’s (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986
|
145
|
|
Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC
|
151
|
|
Implementation of Maintenance Orders
|
158
|
|
Injunction for Property
|
162
|
|
Negotiating the Retrieval of Stridhan
|
168
|
|
Conclusion
|
172
|
|
4. Making and Unmaking the Conjugal Family: The Administration of Hindu Law in Society
|
175
|
|
Introduction
|
175
|
|
Caste Formation and Lawmaking among Meghwals
|
177
|
|
Migration to Mumbai and the Statist Construction of the “Caste”
|
178
|
|
Nationalist Movement, Naming the Community, and Attempts at Lawmaking
|
181
|
|
Exposure to Democratic Politics, Creating Structures of Governance, Constructing Identity through Laws
|
184
|
|
Democratizing Panchayats,Civic Awareness, and Law Reforms: From the Panch System to the Panchayat
|
187
|
|
Attempts at Repoliticization and the Conflict over Caste Constitution
|
189
|
|
The Decade of the 1990s: Consolidating the Caste Identity, Social Regulation, and Lawmaking
|
192
|
|
Summary of the Constitutional Provisions: Commonalities, Continuities, and Discontinuities
|
195
|
|
The Gendered Sphere among the Meghwals
|
198
|
|
Innovative Legal Process: Democratic Participatory Justice
|
200
|
|
Structure and Organization of the Meghwal Caste Panchayat
|
202
|
|
Process of Adjudication in the Meghwal Caste Panchayat and the Provision for Appeal
|
202
|
|
Similarities, Dissimilarities, and Hybridity in State Law and Nonstate Law
|
203
|
|
Who Is a Hindu, Who Is a Meghwal?
|
203
|
|
Consent
|
205
|
|
Differing Conceptions of Marriage and Divorce: Marriage as Fixed or Fluid?
|
209
|
|
Validity of Marriage
|
211
|
|
Procedural Aspects of Defining Valid Marriages
|
212
|
|
Divorce in Caste Laws
|
213
|
|
Economic Rights within Marriage and upon Divorce
|
216
|
|
Interactions between Diverse Societal Organizations and Actors
|
218
|
|
Contestations among Informal Legal Actors
|
218
|
|
Women’s Organizations as Informal Forums of Justice: Implementing State Law without Litigation
|
220
|
|
Women’s Organization as Moral Watchdogs: Women’s Organizations and Caste Authorities
|
221
|
|
Bargaining for Women’s Rights vis-à-vis the State and the Caste
|
222
|
|
The Caste Panchayat among the Sai Suthars
|
224
|
|
Internal Governance of Family Matters among the Sai Suthars
|
224
|
|
The Gendered Sphere among the Sai Suthars
|
227
|
|
Fragmented Caste Panchayat and the Adjudication of the Family within the Caste
|
229
|
|
The Caste Is the Public Sphere and the State Private
|
231
|
|
In the Shadow of State Law and Courts
|
232
|
|
Justice through “Other Means”
|
232
|
|
Women’s Experiences in State Courts
|
233
|
|
Dual Patriarchies of the Family and the State
|
234
|
|
Struggles for Legal Autonomy in Family Matters among the Kutchi Visa Oswals (KVOs)
|
237
|
|
The KVOs and the History of Migration to Mumbai
|
238
|
|
Forming a Panchayat
|
239
|
|
Family, Capital, and Religio-Cultural Organization
|
242
|
|
Gendered Sphere within the Caste
|
244
|
|
Protecting the Good Woman: Denial of Divorce in the Family Court
|
245
|
|
Rubber-Stamping Informal Settlements
|
247
|
|
Social Movement around Marriage and Divorce – Reaction to State-Led Reforms
|
251
|
|
State-Society Encounters in Law: Comparison of Caste-Based Legal Forums
|
252
|
|
Other Societal Legal Bodies: Women’s Organizations
|
254
|
|
Legal Actors in Society: Notaries, Lawyers, Middlemen
|
259
|
|
Leveraging Authority: Strongmen and Political Parties in the Adjudication of Hindu Law in Society
|
261
|
|
Conclusion
|
265
|
|
5. Juristic Diversity, Contestations over “Islamic Law,” and Women’s Rights: Regulation of Matrimonial Matters in Muslim Personal Law
|
267
|
|
Introduction
|
267
|
|
The Nature of Muslim Personal Law and the Classification of Legal Actors and Institutions in Societal Arena
|
268
|
|
Individual Legal Actors and “Private” Divorce
|
269
|
|
Interlawyer Negotiations
|
273
|
|
The Clergy
|
274
|
|
Strongmen
|
276
|
|
Organized Legal Bodies, Doorstep Courts, and Processes of Adjudication
|
278
|
|
The Administration of Muslim Personal Law in the Dar ul Qaza
|
278
|
|
Residential Committees
|
281
|
|
Civil Society and the Administration of Muslim Personal Law
|
284
|
|
The Doorstep Courts
|
290
|
|
Dispute Resolution among Organized Sects: The Khojas
|
292
|
|
Sociopolitical Changes in the Community between the 1950s and the 1990s
|
295
|
|
Family Laws among the Ithana Ashari Khojas
|
296
|
|
Interaction with Other Forums
|
298
|
|
The Question of Representation: Who Represents the Community?
|
300
|
|
Divergent Opinions on the Establishment of Religious “Courts”
|
302
|
|
Conflict and Convergence between Statutory Muslim Personal Law and Societal Laws
|
303
|
|
Agency and Its Constraints: Muslim Women’s Rights in the Legally Plural Sphere
|
312
|
|
The Campaign around Nikahnama: Reforms from Within
|
316
|
|
Competing Ideologies and Interests among Socio-Legal Actors and Institutions
|
320
|
|
Conclusion
|
323
|
|
6. Conclusion
|
325
|
|
What Factors Would Bring About a Change in This Model?
|
333
|
|
The Shared Adjudication Model Compared to Other Proposals for Accommodating Communities and Ensuring Gender Equality
|
335
|
|
Discussing Law Reform in Personal Laws
|
343
|
|
Conclusion
|
346
|
|
Appendix Appendix
|
349
|
|
Bibliography
|
351
|
|
Index
|
387
|