Conflicts in a Conflict A Conflict of Laws Case Study on Israel and the Palestinian Territories

• Outlines the jurisdictional designs of the territories Israel occupied in the 1967 Six-Day War, with special emphasis on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, both before and after the Oslo Peace Process
• Offers an extensive analysis of the adjudicative jurisdictional capacity of Israeli courts to deal with civil disputes originating in the Palestinian Territories, as well as the application of the forum non conveniens doctrine to such claims, and the entitlement of the Palestinian Authority to sovereign immunity when sued before an Israeli court
• Discusses how the current choice of law rules, and how their application has affected the residents of the Palestinian Territories in their daily lives
• This research will greatly serve scholars and practitioners in similarly troubled and complex legal settings elsewhere

Conflicts in a Conflict outlines and analyzes the legal doctrines instructing the Israeli courts in private and civil disputes involving the Occupied Palestinian Territories of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, since 1967 until the present day. In doing so, author, Michael Karayanni sheds light on a whole sphere of legal designs and norms that have not received any thorough scholarly attention, as most of the writings thus far have been on issues pertaining to international law, human rights, history, and politics. For the most part, Israeli courts turned to conflict of laws, or private international law to address private disputes implicating the Palestinian Territories. After making a thorough investigation into the jurisdictional designs of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, both before and after the Oslo Peace Accords, Conflicts in a Conflict comes to focus on traditional topics such as adjudicative jurisdiction, choice of law, and recognitions and enforcement of judgments. Related issues such as the foreign sovereign immunity claim of the Palestinian Authority before Israeli courts as well as the extent to which Palestinian plaintiffs were granted access to justice rights, are also outlined and analyzed. 

This book's compelling thesis is the existence of a close relationship between conflict of laws doctrines as they developed over the years and Israeli policies generally in respect of the Palestinian Territories. This study of the conflict of laws in a war setting and conflict of laws in a jurisdictionally ambiguous location, will greatly serve scholars and practitioners in similarly troubled and complex legal situations elsewhere.

Readership: Scholars of Conflict of Law and Public International Law. Anyone interested in the legal, historical and political aspects of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.