Home
Law
Administrative / Constitutional Law
Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review

Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review

Name: Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review
Brand: Cambridge University Press
SKU: 9781107662964
Price: 504.40 HKD
Availability: InStock
Author: Fergal F. Davis; Fiona De Londras
ISBN: 9781107662964

Edited by Fergal F. Davis · Fiona De Londras

Cambridge University Press September 2016

Specifications

ISBN-13: 9781107662964
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Publication: September 2016
Format: Paperback
Jurisdiction: U.K. ? Countri(es) for reference only

Details

Is judicial review an effective and appropriate way to regulate counter-terrorism measures? Some argue that the judiciary is ill-equipped to examine such measures, for instance because they lack the expertise of the institutions which bring them about under exigent conditions.

<="" a="" all="" america,="" and="" argument="" attempt="" australasia.="" brings="" broad="" but="" claim="" constitutionalism.="" counter-terrorism="" crucial="" debate="" dimensions.="" does="" europe="" explore="" for="" from="" in="" is="" it="" its="" judicial="" jurisdiction's="" jurisdictions,="" maintaining="" measures="" north="" not="" of="" others="" p="" principles="" range="" rather="" review="" sides="" subjecting="" that="" the="" this="" to="" together="" voices="" volume="">

The debates are essentially concerned with fundamental questions of organising and making accountable the exercise of power in a particularly challenging environment. The book is necessary reading for all those concerned with counter-terrorism, but also with broader public law, constitutional law and administrative law principles.

List of contributors

Acknowledgements

Introduction. Counter-terrorism judicial review: beyond dichotomies Fergal F. Davis and Fiona de Londras

Part I. Judging Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review:

1. Counter-terrorism judicial review as regulatory constitutionalism Fiona de Londras

2. Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary Jens Elo Rytter

3. When good cases go bad: unintended consequences of rights-friendly judgments David Jenkins

4. The rhetoric and reality of judicial review of counter-terrorism actions: the United States experience Jules Lobel

Part II. Beyond Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review:

5. Emergency law as administrative law Mark Tushnet

6. The politics of counter-terrorism judicial review: creating effective parliamentary scrutiny Fergal F. Davis

7. Independent reviewers as alternative: an empirical study from Australia and the United Kingdom Jessie Blackbourn

8. Public inquiries as an attempt to fill accountability gaps left by judicial and legislative review Kent Roach

Part III. Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review in the Political Constitution:

9. Rebalancing the unbalanced constitution: juridification and national security in the United Kingdom Roger Masterman

10. Business as usual: deference in counter-terrorism rights review Cora Chan

11. Deference and dialogue in the real-world counter-terrorism context Gavin Phillipson

Part IV. Internationalised Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review:

12. Counter-terrorism law and judicial review: the challenge for the Court of Justice of the European Union Cian C. Murphy

13. Post 9/11 UK counter-terrorism cases in the European Court of Human Rights: a 'dialogic' approach to rights' protection or appeasement of national authorities? Helen Fenwick

14. Accountability for counter-terrorism: challenges and potential in the role of the courts Helen Duffy

Index.

HKD 504.40 −3%

HKD 520.00

Inclusive of HK delivery

Ready to ship

Quantity