Details
The long ascendancy of pluralism and 'collective laissez-faire' as a guiding ideology of British labour law was emphatically shattered by the New Right ideology of Thatcher and Major. When New Labour was finally returned to power in 1997, it did not, however, attempt to resurrect the pre-Thatcher preference for pluralist non-intervention in collective industrial relations. Instead, it purported to follow a 'Third Way'. A centrepiece of this new approach was the statutory recognition provision, introduced in Schedule A1 TULRCA 1992. By breaking with the tradition of voluntarism in respect of recognition of trade unions, New Labour sought to provide a model of collective labour law which combined legal support with control through juridification. A closer study of both the history of approaches to recognition and the current provisions opens up fundamental questions as to the nature of this new model and the ones it aimed to replace.
This book uses political philosophy to elucidate the character of those historical approaches and the nature of the 'Third Way' itself in relation to statutory union recognition. In particular, it traces the progressive eclipse of civic republican values in labour law, in preference for a liberal political philosophy. The book articulates and defends a civic republican philosophy in terms of freedom as non-domination, the intrinsic value of democratic participation through deliberative democracy, and community. This can be contrasted with the rights-based individualism and State neutrality characteristic of the liberal approach. Despite the promise of civic community in the 'Third Way' rhetoric, this book demonstrates that the reality of New Labour's experiment in union recognition was an emphatic reassertion of liberalism in the sphere of workers' collective rights. This is the first monograph to offer a sustained critical analysis of legal approaches to trade union recognition. It will be of particular interest to labour lawyers, but also a wider audience of scholars in political philosophy and industrial relations.
Alan Bogg is a Fellow and Tutor in Law of Hertford College, Oxford.
Allan Bogg is a genius. His recent book The Democratic Aspects of Trade Union Recognition is a tour de force of 20th-century British industrial relations history, theory and employment law jurisprudence.
Tim Ayres
Journal of Industrial Relations
Volume 53, No. 5
Bogg's finely structured and nicely written book makes an important contribution to labour law scholarship by providing a coherent and sustained normative justification for active state support for trade union recognition, a list of the key elements of what this support should look like, and a critical analysis of the interpretation and application of the UK statutory recognition procedure contained in Schedule A1 of the Trade Union and Labour Regulations ... Act 1992.
The Democratic Aspects of Trade Union Recognition makes a valuable contribution to labour law scholarship by emphasizing the important role that trade unions and collective bargaining play in furthering core values such as freedom as non-domination and political equality in democratic societies.
Judy Fudge
The International Journal of Law in Context
Volume 7, Issue 1, 2011
...the book provides a bold and exemplary study in labour law, which combines clear discussion of political theory with a detailed assessment of legal provisions.
Hugh Collins
British Journal of Industrial Relations
May 2011
[a] comprehensive and detailed account of union recognition procedures and the political philosophies underpinning them
Sian Moore
The Industrial Law Journal
March 2010
The Democratic Aspects of Trade Union Recognition is an excellent book, the result of years of thoughtful engagement with the subject matter.
Ruth Dukes
Modern Law Review
Volume 73, Issue 4, 2010
This is one of the most interesting, stimulating an challenging books on labour law to have been published in recent times.
A masterly analysis in which the author shows great skill in lucidly combining a detailed understanding of labour law in the United Kingdom and the United States, with deep political theory.
Keith Ewing
Cambridge Law Journal
Voume 69, Part 2
This is a rich, rewarding work that will inspire and inform debate for years to come.
Aaron Rathmell
Law Quarterly Review
Volume 127
