Introduction Jan Rosen
PART I IP IN THE EUROPEAN LEGAL FRAMEWORK
1. Herman Cohen Jehoram (1994), 'The E.C. Copyright Directives, Economics and Authors' Rights', IIC Studies, 25, 821-39
2. Claes Granmar (2011), 'Intellectual Property Rights and the Single Market' Nordiskt Immateriellt Rattsskydd, Issue 4, 321-51
3. Reto M. Hilty (2012), 'Individual, Multiple and Collective Ownership: What Impact on Competition?', in Jan Rosen (ed.) Individualism and Collectiveness in Intellectual Property Law, Chapter 1, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 3-44
4. Annette Kur and Dietmar Harhoff (2014), 'Great Data, Nice Tale, but What's the Message? The OHIM/EPO Study on the Economic Relevanceof IP-Intensive Industries in the EU', International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 45, 617-20
5. Lydia Lundstedt (2012), 'Transborder Patent Entitlement and Ownership Disputes: Which Forum has Jurisdiction?', Nordiskt Immateriellt Rattsskydd (1), 6-25
6. Christophe Geiger (2010), 'The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement and Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: What Consequences for the European Union?' in Jan Rosen (ed.) Intellectual Property at the Crossroads of Trade, Chapter 8, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 167-81
PART II PATENTS
7. Milsosz Malaga (2014), 'The European Patent with Unitary Effect: Incentive to Dominate? A Look From the EU Competition Law Viewpoint' International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 45 (6), September, 621-47
8. Timo Minssen and David Nilsson (2012), 'The Industrial Application Requirement for Biotech Inventions in Light of Recent EPO and UK Case Law: A Plausible Approach or a Mere "Hunting Licence?"'European Intellectual Property Review, 34 (10), 689-703
9. Joseph Straus (2014), 'The Bolar Exemption and the Supply of Patented Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients to Generic Drug Producers: An Attempt to Interpret Article 10(6) of Directive 2004/27,' Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 9 (11), 895-908
10. Geertrui Van Overwalle (2012), 'Individualism, Collectivism and Openness in Patent Law: From Exclusion to Inclusion Through Licensing', in Jan Rosen (ed.) Individualism and Collectiveness in Intellectual Property Law, Chapter 4, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 71-127
11. Perttu Virtanen (2013), 'Software Patents and "Technology Specific" Exclusion in Article 52 (3) EPC. A Legal Chimera?,' Nordiskt Immateriellt Rattsskydd, Issue 6, 620-32
12. Alessandro Steinfl (2000), 'The Doctrine of Equivalents through the Eye of the European Patent Convention', Casrip Symposium Series, 6, July, 114-24 PART III TRADE MARKS
13. Annette Kur (2013), 'Not Prior in Time, But Superior in Right - How Trademark Registrations Can be Affected by Third-Party Interests in a Sign', IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 44, 790-814
14. Alison Firth (2008), 'Signs, Surfaces, Shapes and Structures - the Protection of Product Design Under Trade Mark Law', in Graeme B. Dinwoodie and Mark D. Janis (eds) A Handbook of Contemporary Research, Chapter 19, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 498-522 15. Nina Barzey (2010), 'Functions of a Trademark - A Way of Seeing Life? The Advertising Function and the Relation Between Double Identity and Extended Protection', Nordiskt Immateriellt Rattsskydd, Issue 4, 324-38 16. Charles Gielen (2014), 'Trademark Dilution under European Law', Trademark Reporter, 104 (3), May-June, 693-730 17. Paul Maeyaert and Jeroen Muyldermans (2013), 'Likelihood of Confusion in Trademark Law: A Practical Guide Based on the Case Law in Community Trade Mark Oppositions from 2002 to 2012,' Trademark Reporter, 103 (5), 1032---114 PART IV COPYRIGHT AND RELATED RIGHTS18. Silke von Lewinski (2010) 'Introduction: Analysis: Sections 1-5' in Michel Walter and Silke von Lewinski (eds), European Copyright Law. A Commentary, New York: NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 6-38 19. Henrik Bengtsson (2012), 'EU Harmonization of the Copyright Originality Criterion', World Service Group, June, 1-8
20. Ana Ramalho (2014), 'Conceptualising the European Union's Competence in Copyright - What can the EU Do?', IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 45 (2),178-200
21. Petteri Gunther (2014), 'The Principle of Exhaustion and the Resale of Digital Music in Europe: A Comparative Analysis of the Used Soft GmbH v. Oracle International Corp. and Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi, Inc. Cases', Nordiskt Immateriellt Rattsskydd (2), 205-29
22. Johan Axhamn (2014), 'Internet Linking and the Notion of 'New Public", Nordiskt Immateriellt Rattsskydd, Issue 2, 110-32
PART V OTHER IP RIGHTS: GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS, TRADE SECRETS, DATABASES
23. Uma Suthersanen (2011), 'Function, Art and Fashion: Do we need the EU Design Law?' Queen Mary, University of London, School of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper No.
88/2011, 1-22
24. Gil Grassie (2014), 'Trade Secrets: the New EU Enforcement Regime', Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 9 (8), 677-83
25. Charlotte Waelde (2007)' Database Copyright: The Story of BHB' in Paul Torremsans (ed.), Copyright Law. A Handbook of Contemporary Research, Chapter 5, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 109-32
26. Mathew J. Rippon (2014), 'What is the Geography of Geographical Indications? Place, Production Methods and Protected Food Names', Area, 46, June, 1-9
27. Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan (2013), 'The International Legal Framework for the Protection of Utility Models: Unmatched Flexibility for Domestic Experimentation?', The WIPO Journal, 4 (2), 175-90 Index
