|
List of abbreviations
|
xiv
|
|
Table of cases
|
xvii
|
|
Table of treaties
|
xxxiv
|
|
Introductory observations
|
1
|
|
Part I Setting the framework
|
7
|
|
1 Changing winds – three signs
|
9
|
|
1.1 The first sign – conceptual evolution
|
9
|
|
1.2 The second sign – integrating the environment into investment treaties
|
14
|
|
1.3 The third sign – the environment breaks into investment disputes
|
17
|
|
2 Conceptualising interactions
|
24
|
|
2.1 Foreign investment and the environment
|
24
|
|
2.2 Synergies
|
27
|
|
2.3 Conflicts
|
28
|
|
2.3.1 Basic definitions
|
28
|
|
2.3.2 Normative and legitimacy conflicts in theory
|
29
|
|
2.3.3 Normative and legitimacy conflicts in treaty practice
|
34
|
|
2.4 Levels and sectors
|
39
|
|
2.4.1 Levels
|
39
|
|
2.4.2 Sectors
|
39
|
|
3 Synergies – harnessing foreign investment to promote environmental protection
|
41
|
|
3.1 The form of synergies – environmental project finance and PPPs
|
42
|
|
3.1.1 Environmental project finance
|
42
|
|
3.1.2 Environmental PPPs
|
47
|
|
3.2 The substance of synergies – climate change and biodiversity as examples
|
50
|
|
3.2.1 Foreign investment in climate change initiatives
|
50
|
|
3.2.2 Foreign investment in biodiversity-related activities
|
54
|
|
4 Conflicts I – Soft control mechanisms
|
59
|
|
4.1 Standards of conduct
|
60
|
|
4.1.1 Direct standards affecting multinational enterprises
|
60
|
|
4.1.2 Indirect standards affecting financial intermediaries
|
65
|
|
4.2 Contractual approaches
|
67
|
|
4.2.1 Regulatory angle
|
68
|
|
4.2.2 Components of environmental contracts
|
69
|
|
4.3 Accountability mechanisms
|
71
|
|
4.3.1 Controlling companies – direct mechanisms
|
72
|
|
4.3.2 Controlling the controllers – indirect mechanisms
|
79
|
|
5 Conflicts II – adjudication mechanisms
|
83
|
|
5.1 The adjudication of environment-related disputes
|
83
|
|
5.2 Jurisdictional matters
|
86
|
|
5.2.1 Jurisdictional bases in investment arbitration
|
86
|
|
5.2.2 Environmental claims
|
89
|
|
5.2.3 Investments in accordance with (environmental) law
|
95
|
|
5.3 Applicable law
|
100
|
|
5.3.1 Preliminary observations
|
100
|
|
5.3.2 Choice of law and other indications
|
101
|
|
5.3.3 Relevance
|
108
|
|
5.4 Procedural matters
|
113
|
|
5.4.1 Role of non-disputing parties
|
113
|
|
5.4.2 Evidentiary issues
|
118
|
|
5.5 Damages
|
123
|
|
5.5.1 The irrelevance thesis
|
124
|
|
5.5.2 The police powers thesis
|
125
|
|
5.5.3 Middle grounds
|
126
|
|
Part II Normative conflicts
|
131
|
|
6 Normative priority in international law
|
133
|
|
6.1 Fragmentation as it concerns the relations between environmental and investment protection
|
134
|
|
6.2 Specific conflict norms
|
136
|
|
6.3 General conflict norms
|
140
|
|
6.3.1 Sequential application
|
140
|
|
6.3.2 Lex superior
|
141
|
|
6.3.3 Lex specialis
|
144
|
|
6.3.4 Lex posterior
|
146
|
|
6.3.5 Interpretation techniques
|
148
|
|
7 Foreign investment and the international regulation of freshwater
|
158
|
|
7.1 International regulation of freshwater – an analysis of collision points
|
158
|
|
7.1.1 Overview
|
158
|
|
7.1.2 The regulatory approach
|
160
|
|
7.1.3 The human rights approach
|
164
|
|
7.2 Decisions from adjudicatory and quasi-adjudicatory bodies
|
167
|
|
7.2.1 Overview
|
167
|
|
7.2.2 Water allocation
|
168
|
|
7.2.3 Pollution and depletion of water-bodies
|
171
|
|
7.2.4 Procedural requirements
|
175
|
|
7.2.5 Access to clean and affordable water
|
179
|
|
7.3 Assessing contemporary practice
|
182
|
|
7.3.1 Conceptual findings
|
182
|
|
7.3.2 Some practical problems
|
184
|
|
8 Foreign investment and the protection of biological and cultural diversity
|
189
|
|
8.1 The protection of biological and cultural diversity – an analysis of collision points
|
189
|
|
8.1.1 Overview
|
189
|
|
8.1.2 The regulatory approach
|
191
|
|
8.1.3 The human rights approach
|
197
|
|
8.2 Decisions from adjudicatory and quasi-adjudicatory bodies
|
198
|
|
8.2.1 Overview
|
198
|
|
8.2.2 Protected areas and species
|
198
|
|
8.2.3 Protection of minorities and indigenous peoples
|
204
|
|
8.2.4 Other environmental obligations
|
211
|
|
8.3 Assessing contemporary practice
|
214
|
|
8.3.1 Conceptual findings
|
215
|
|
8.3.2 Some practical problems
|
216
|
|
9 Foreign investment and the international regulation of dangerous substances and activities
|
222
|
|
9.1 The regulation of dangerous substances and activities – an analysis of collision points
|
222
|
|
9.1.1 Overview
|
222
|
|
9.1.2 The regulatory approach
|
225
|
|
9.1.3 The human rights approach
|
229
|
|
9.2 Decisions from adjudicatory and quasi-adjudicatory bodies
|
231
|
|
9.2.1 Overview
|
231
|
|
9.2.2 Administrative permits
|
232
|
|
9.2.3 Safety standards
|
236
|
|
9.2.4 Restriction of movement
|
239
|
|
9.2.5 Protection of the rights of individuals and minorities
|
242
|
|
9.3 Assessing contemporary practice
|
246
|
|
9.3.1 Conceptual findings
|
246
|
|
9.3.2 Some practical problems
|
247
|
|
10 Foreign investment and the climate change regime
|
253
|
|
10.1 Climate change policies – an analysis of collision points
|
253
|
|
10.1.1 Overview
|
253
|
|
10.1.2 The regulatory approach
|
254
|
|
10.1.3 The human rights approach
|
258
|
|
10.2 Decisions from adjudicatory and quasi-adjudicatory bodies
|
260
|
|
10.2.1 Overview
|
260
|
|
10.2.2 Cap-and-trade systems
|
261
|
|
10.2.3 Command-and-control regulation
|
265
|
|
10.2.4 Differentiation (subsidies and duties)
|
267
|
|
10.2.5 The use of a human rights approach
|
271
|
|
10.3 Assessing contemporary practice
|
273
|
|
10.3.1 Conceptual findings
|
273
|
|
10.3.2 Some practical problems
|
274
|
|
Part III Legitimacy conflicts
|
279
|
|
11 Normative priority between different legal systems
|
281
|
|
11.1 Legitimacy conflicts
|
281
|
|
11.2 Specific conflict norms
|
283
|
|
11.2.1 Types of specific conflict norms
|
283
|
|
11.2.2 Some illustrations
|
283
|
|
11.2.3 Effects
|
286
|
|
11.3 General conflict norms
|
287
|
|
11.3.1 Relations between domestic and international law
|
287
|
|
11.3.2 Conflicts of (domestic) laws
|
290
|
|
11.3.3 Regulatory powers as general conflict norms
|
291
|
|
12 Environmental measures and expropriation clauses
|
293
|
|
12.1 Three strands of cases
|
294
|
|
12.2 Direct environmental expropriation
|
295
|
|
12.3 Targeted environmental measures
|
297
|
|
12.3.1 Targeted measures v. general regulation
|
297
|
|
12.3.2 Targeted environmental measures amounting to an expropriation
|
299
|
|
12.3.3 Targeted environmental measures not amounting to an expropriation
|
301
|
|
12.4 Regulatory environmental measures
|
305
|
|
12.4.1 Rule or exception?
|
305
|
|
12.4.2 Reasons why environmental regulation rarely amounts to an expropriation
|
307
|
|
13 Environmental measures and non-discrimination standards
|
316
|
|
13.1 Non-discrimination in foreign investment law
|
317
|
|
13.1.1 Conceptual distinctions
|
317
|
|
13.1.2 The components of non-discrimination standards
|
318
|
|
13.2 Differentiation at various stages of the investment cycle
|
320
|
|
13.2.1 Green investment protectionism
|
320
|
|
13.2.2 Pre-establishment environmental differentiation
|
322
|
|
13.3 The concept of ‘like circumstances’ from an environmental perspective
|
324
|
|
13.3.1 ‘Like circumstances’ in trade and investment
|
324
|
|
13.3.2 ‘Like circumstances’ and the relevance of environmental considerations
|
327
|
|
13.4 The objective test of differential treatment
|
330
|
|
13.5 Justifying differential treatment of similar situations
|
332
|
|
13.5.1 Rule or exception?
|
332
|
|
13.5.2 The relevance of purpose
|
333
|
|
13.5.3 Justification clauses
|
333
|
|
13.5.4 Other justifying factors
|
335
|
|
14 Environmental measures, stability and due process
|
337
|
|
14.1 The protection of stability and environmental regulatory change
|
338
|
|
14.1.1 The legal anatomy of stability commitments
|
338
|
|
14.1.2 Stabilising clauses and environmental regulation
|
339
|
|
14.1.3 Legitimate expectations under the FET standard
|
350
|
|
14.2 Environmental regulatory change and due process
|
355
|
|
14.2.1 The link between due process and environmental regulatory change
|
355
|
|
14.2.2 Procedural fairness under FET clauses
|
357
|
|
14.2.3 Denial of justice
|
363
|
|
15 Defence arguments based on environmental considerations
|
366
|
|
15.1 The police powers doctrine
|
367
|
|
15.1.1 Sources
|
367
|
|
15.1.2 The use of the police powers doctrine to justify environmental measures
|
369
|
|
15.1.3 Specific assurances and environmental measures
|
371
|
|
15.1.4 Circumscribing the scope of specific assurances
|
374
|
|
15.2 The margin of appreciation doctrine
|
376
|
|
15.2.1 Sources
|
376
|
|
15.2.2 Applicability in the context of investment disputes
|
377
|
|
15.2.3 Margin of appreciation and police powers
|
379
|
|
15.3 Emergency and necessity clauses
|
381
|
|
15.3.1 Sources
|
381
|
|
15.3.2 Asserting the defence
|
383
|
|
15.3.3 Environmental justifications between emergency and necessity
|
384
|
|
15.3.4 Effects
|
389
|
|
Concluding observations
|
391
|
|
Bibliography
|
394
|
|
Index
|
40
|