|
List of abbreviations
|
xiv |
|
Table of cases
|
xvii |
|
Table of treaties
|
xxxiv |
|
Introductory observations
|
1 |
|
Part I Setting the framework
|
7 |
|
1 Changing winds – three signs
|
9 |
|
1.1 The first sign – conceptual evolution
|
9 |
|
1.2 The second sign – integrating the environment into investment treaties
|
14 |
|
1.3 The third sign – the environment breaks into investment disputes
|
17 |
|
2 Conceptualising interactions
|
24 |
|
2.1 Foreign investment and the environment
|
24 |
|
2.2 Synergies
|
27 |
|
2.3 Conflicts
|
28 |
|
2.3.1 Basic definitions
|
28 |
|
2.3.2 Normative and legitimacy conflicts in theory
|
29 |
|
2.3.3 Normative and legitimacy conflicts in treaty practice
|
34 |
|
2.4 Levels and sectors
|
39 |
|
2.4.1 Levels
|
39 |
|
2.4.2 Sectors
|
39 |
|
3 Synergies – harnessing foreign investment to promote environmental protection
|
41 |
|
3.1 The form of synergies – environmental project finance and PPPs
|
42 |
|
3.1.1 Environmental project finance
|
42 |
|
3.1.2 Environmental PPPs
|
47 |
|
3.2 The substance of synergies – climate change and biodiversity as examples
|
50 |
|
3.2.1 Foreign investment in climate change initiatives
|
50 |
|
3.2.2 Foreign investment in biodiversity-related activities
|
54 |
|
4 Conflicts I – Soft control mechanisms
|
59 |
|
4.1 Standards of conduct
|
60 |
|
4.1.1 Direct standards affecting multinational enterprises
|
60 |
|
4.1.2 Indirect standards affecting financial intermediaries
|
65 |
|
4.2 Contractual approaches
|
67 |
|
4.2.1 Regulatory angle
|
68 |
|
4.2.2 Components of environmental contracts
|
69 |
|
4.3 Accountability mechanisms
|
71 |
|
4.3.1 Controlling companies – direct mechanisms
|
72 |
|
4.3.2 Controlling the controllers – indirect mechanisms
|
79 |
|
5 Conflicts II – adjudication mechanisms
|
83 |
|
5.1 The adjudication of environment-related disputes
|
83 |
|
5.2 Jurisdictional matters
|
86 |
|
5.2.1 Jurisdictional bases in investment arbitration
|
86 |
|
5.2.2 Environmental claims
|
89 |
|
5.2.3 Investments in accordance with (environmental) law
|
95 |
|
5.3 Applicable law
|
100 |
|
5.3.1 Preliminary observations
|
100 |
|
5.3.2 Choice of law and other indications
|
101 |
|
5.3.3 Relevance
|
108 |
|
5.4 Procedural matters
|
113 |
|
5.4.1 Role of non-disputing parties
|
113 |
|
5.4.2 Evidentiary issues
|
118 |
|
5.5 Damages
|
123 |
|
5.5.1 The irrelevance thesis
|
124 |
|
5.5.2 The police powers thesis
|
125 |
|
5.5.3 Middle grounds
|
126 |
|
Part II Normative conflicts
|
131 |
|
6 Normative priority in international law
|
133 |
|
6.1 Fragmentation as it concerns the relations between environmental and investment protection
|
134 |
|
6.2 Specific conflict norms
|
136 |
|
6.3 General conflict norms
|
140 |
|
6.3.1 Sequential application
|
140 |
|
6.3.2 Lex superior
|
141 |
|
6.3.3 Lex specialis
|
144 |
|
6.3.4 Lex posterior
|
146 |
|
6.3.5 Interpretation techniques
|
148 |
|
7 Foreign investment and the international regulation of freshwater
|
158 |
|
7.1 International regulation of freshwater – an analysis of collision points
|
158 |
|
7.1.1 Overview
|
158 |
|
7.1.2 The regulatory approach
|
160 |
|
7.1.3 The human rights approach
|
164 |
|
7.2 Decisions from adjudicatory and quasi-adjudicatory bodies
|
167 |
|
7.2.1 Overview
|
167 |
|
7.2.2 Water allocation
|
168 |
|
7.2.3 Pollution and depletion of water-bodies
|
171 |
|
7.2.4 Procedural requirements
|
175 |
|
7.2.5 Access to clean and affordable water
|
179 |
|
7.3 Assessing contemporary practice
|
182 |
|
7.3.1 Conceptual findings
|
182 |
|
7.3.2 Some practical problems
|
184 |
|
8 Foreign investment and the protection of biological and cultural diversity
|
189 |
|
8.1 The protection of biological and cultural diversity – an analysis of collision points
|
189 |
|
8.1.1 Overview
|
189 |
|
8.1.2 The regulatory approach
|
191 |
|
8.1.3 The human rights approach
|
197 |
|
8.2 Decisions from adjudicatory and quasi-adjudicatory bodies
|
198 |
|
8.2.1 Overview
|
198 |
|
8.2.2 Protected areas and species
|
198 |
|
8.2.3 Protection of minorities and indigenous peoples
|
204 |
|
8.2.4 Other environmental obligations
|
211 |
|
8.3 Assessing contemporary practice
|
214 |
|
8.3.1 Conceptual findings
|
215 |
|
8.3.2 Some practical problems
|
216 |
|
9 Foreign investment and the international regulation of dangerous substances and activities
|
222 |
|
9.1 The regulation of dangerous substances and activities – an analysis of collision points
|
222 |
|
9.1.1 Overview
|
222 |
|
9.1.2 The regulatory approach
|
225 |
|
9.1.3 The human rights approach
|
229 |
|
9.2 Decisions from adjudicatory and quasi-adjudicatory bodies
|
231 |
|
9.2.1 Overview
|
231 |
|
9.2.2 Administrative permits
|
232 |
|
9.2.3 Safety standards
|
236 |
|
9.2.4 Restriction of movement
|
239 |
|
9.2.5 Protection of the rights of individuals and minorities
|
242 |
|
9.3 Assessing contemporary practice
|
246 |
|
9.3.1 Conceptual findings
|
246 |
|
9.3.2 Some practical problems
|
247 |
|
10 Foreign investment and the climate change regime
|
253 |
|
10.1 Climate change policies – an analysis of collision points
|
253 |
|
10.1.1 Overview
|
253 |
|
10.1.2 The regulatory approach
|
254 |
|
10.1.3 The human rights approach
|
258 |
|
10.2 Decisions from adjudicatory and quasi-adjudicatory bodies
|
260 |
|
10.2.1 Overview
|
260 |
|
10.2.2 Cap-and-trade systems
|
261 |
|
10.2.3 Command-and-control regulation
|
265 |
|
10.2.4 Differentiation (subsidies and duties)
|
267 |
|
10.2.5 The use of a human rights approach
|
271 |
|
10.3 Assessing contemporary practice
|
273 |
|
10.3.1 Conceptual findings
|
273 |
|
10.3.2 Some practical problems
|
274 |
|
Part III Legitimacy conflicts
|
279 |
|
11 Normative priority between different legal systems
|
281 |
|
11.1 Legitimacy conflicts
|
281 |
|
11.2 Specific conflict norms
|
283 |
|
11.2.1 Types of specific conflict norms
|
283 |
|
11.2.2 Some illustrations
|
283 |
|
11.2.3 Effects
|
286 |
|
11.3 General conflict norms
|
287 |
|
11.3.1 Relations between domestic and international law
|
287 |
|
11.3.2 Conflicts of (domestic) laws
|
290 |
|
11.3.3 Regulatory powers as general conflict norms
|
291 |
|
12 Environmental measures and expropriation clauses
|
293 |
|
12.1 Three strands of cases
|
294 |
|
12.2 Direct environmental expropriation
|
295 |
|
12.3 Targeted environmental measures
|
297 |
|
12.3.1 Targeted measures v. general regulation
|
297 |
|
12.3.2 Targeted environmental measures amounting to an expropriation
|
299 |
|
12.3.3 Targeted environmental measures not amounting to an expropriation
|
301 |
|
12.4 Regulatory environmental measures
|
305 |
|
12.4.1 Rule or exception?
|
305 |
|
12.4.2 Reasons why environmental regulation rarely amounts to an expropriation
|
307 |
|
13 Environmental measures and non-discrimination standards
|
316 |
|
13.1 Non-discrimination in foreign investment law
|
317 |
|
13.1.1 Conceptual distinctions
|
317 |
|
13.1.2 The components of non-discrimination standards
|
318 |
|
13.2 Differentiation at various stages of the investment cycle
|
320 |
|
13.2.1 Green investment protectionism
|
320 |
|
13.2.2 Pre-establishment environmental differentiation
|
322 |
|
13.3 The concept of ‘like circumstances’ from an environmental perspective
|
324 |
|
13.3.1 ‘Like circumstances’ in trade and investment
|
324 |
|
13.3.2 ‘Like circumstances’ and the relevance of environmental considerations
|
327 |
|
13.4 The objective test of differential treatment
|
330 |
|
13.5 Justifying differential treatment of similar situations
|
332 |
|
13.5.1 Rule or exception?
|
332 |
|
13.5.2 The relevance of purpose
|
333 |
|
13.5.3 Justification clauses
|
333 |
|
13.5.4 Other justifying factors
|
335 |
|
14 Environmental measures, stability and due process
|
337 |
|
14.1 The protection of stability and environmental regulatory change
|
338 |
|
14.1.1 The legal anatomy of stability commitments
|
338 |
|
14.1.2 Stabilising clauses and environmental regulation
|
339 |
|
14.1.3 Legitimate expectations under the FET standard
|
350 |
|
14.2 Environmental regulatory change and due process
|
355 |
|
14.2.1 The link between due process and environmental regulatory change
|
355 |
|
14.2.2 Procedural fairness under FET clauses
|
357 |
|
14.2.3 Denial of justice
|
363 |
|
15 Defence arguments based on environmental considerations
|
366 |
|
15.1 The police powers doctrine
|
367 |
|
15.1.1 Sources
|
367 |
|
15.1.2 The use of the police powers doctrine to justify environmental measures
|
369 |
|
15.1.3 Specific assurances and environmental measures
|
371 |
|
15.1.4 Circumscribing the scope of specific assurances
|
374 |
|
15.2 The margin of appreciation doctrine
|
376 |
|
15.2.1 Sources
|
376 |
|
15.2.2 Applicability in the context of investment disputes
|
377 |
|
15.2.3 Margin of appreciation and police powers
|
379 |
|
15.3 Emergency and necessity clauses
|
381 |
|
15.3.1 Sources
|
381 |
|
15.3.2 Asserting the defence
|
383 |
|
15.3.3 Environmental justifications between emergency and necessity
|
384 |
|
15.3.4 Effects
|
389 |
|
Concluding observations
|
391 |
|
Bibliography
|
394 |
|
Index
|
40 |