German Law of Unjust Enrichment and Restitution Comparative Introduction

Name: German Law of Unjust Enrichment and Restitution
Brand: Oxford University Press
SKU: 9780199533114
Price: 1418.63 HKD
Availability: OutOfStock
Author: Gerhard Danneman
ISBN: 9780199533114

By Gerhard Danneman

Oxford University Press July 2009

Specifications

ISBN-13: 9780199533114
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: July 2009
Format: Hardback , 348 pages
Jurisdiction: Germany ? Countri(es) for reference only

Details

Relates German law to English law, to help place German law in context for those trained in the common law.
Sets unjustified enrichment in the wider context of contract law, property law and negotiorum gestio, to aid understanding of the context within which unjustified enrichment operates in German and English law.
Provides full English translations of key cases and provisions of the civil code to make the German law accessible to English readers.
Informs the topical English debates regarding the adoption of the German approach by demonstrating the merits and shortcomings of the system as experienced in Germany

This book provides the most comprehensive description of the German law of unjustified enrichment in the English language. It explains to common law readers how German law generally allows restitution for transfers made without legal ground (rather than on the basis of individual unjust factors), an approach which the late Peter Birks proposed for English law to adopt, and which the House of Lords was careful not to rule out for the future in Deutsche Morgan Grenfell v Inland Revenue.

Part I explains the workings of German unjustified enrichment law within the particular context of German contract, tort and property law. It shows how the German general unjust enrichment clause is controlled by limiting its scope to intentional transfers, and complemented by specific grounds of unjust enrichment. This part also explains defences against and measure of enrichment claims. Part II places German law in the comparative context of three different fundamental approaches towards unjustified enrichment, shows some unexpected similarities between English and German law, and discusses whether English law could and should adopt the German approach.

The book gives equal prominence to structural issues and legal doctrine on the one hand, and practical application of the law on the other. It provides leading German cases and relevant statutory provisions in English translation.

Readership: Advanced Students and Academics, Practitioners, and Law reformers.

I Unjustified Enrichment and Restitution in German Law

1 c Introduction:

2: The Undoing of Performance: Basics

3: The Undoing of Performance: Refinements

4: Defences Against Performance-based Claims

5: Restitution Not Based on Performance

6: The Measure of Restitutionary Liability

7: Concurrent Liability

II The Wider Comparative Perspective

8: Classification and Consequences

9: Lessons to Be Learned? III Cases and Statutes

10: Cases

About the Author

Gerhard Dannemann, Professor at Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

Gerhard Dannemann is Chair for British Legal, Economic and Social Structures at Humboldt University Berlin; Chair of the Redaction Committee, and Chair of the Terminology Group at the European Research Group on Existing EU Private Law (Acquis Group); Fellow of the Institute of European and Comparative Law at the University of Oxford; Door Tenant at 3 Pump Court Chambers, London; and Member of the Advisory Council of the Sir William Dale Centre for Legislative Studies at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, University of London.

Reviews

"This superb book is a model of how comparative law can be done. It provides an excellent balance between an overview of a distinct area of the law, detailed discussion of the issues that arise across the whole spectrum of that law, and a significant contribution to an ongoing debate that is of major domestic and wider comparative interest...All in all, the book is a stimulating, learned and invaluable companion to anyone interested in the subject" - Robin Evans-Jones, The Edinburgh Law Review