...an engaging and scholarly read
Tracey Elliott, Medical Law Review
...Cunliffe lays out her book in a manner that makes it extremely readable and an ideal reference source for anyone performing ongoing research about infanticide...She performs meticulous research...and boldly asserts her interpretation of the data while leaving her audience with enough information to disagree with her findings and draw different conclusions...The result is a persuasive and enlightening work with the potential to foster honest dialogue and deter baseless stereotyping in the research and investigation of unexplained infant deaths and adolescent motherhood...Her conclusions are broad enough to apply to readers in any location, and the implications of her research are too important to ignore.
Julie Spain, Journal of Youth and Adolescence
If Professor Emma Cunliffe...had been Kathleen Folbigg's lawyer on appeal, Folbigg likely would not be serving thirty years in prison in New South Wales, for the murder of her four children. Cunliffe is convinced that Folbigg was wrongly convicted; and, by the end of Murder, Medicine and Motherhood, so, I would guess, would most readers be.
...Cunliffe's book is an exhaustive examination of the Folbigg trial, and, more importantly, of the medical, evidentiary, and journalistic context within which the trial played out. Never sensationalistic, Cunliffe treats the tragedy of the unexplained deaths of four children with sensitivity [and] the analysis she brings to the Folbigg case ... is so astute and powerful
Renee Ann Cramer, Law and Politics Book Review
The book is a fascinating and precise study of how law and science come to 'know' through legal processes...The book unfolds over seven tightly conceived, substantive chapters, with a separate introduction and conclusion. At just over 200 pages, this is not a long book but given the depth and breadth of the research, each word counts...it makes an important and very accessible contribution to the understandings of legal and scientific knowledge in the courtroom.
Doris Buss, Punishment & Society
[The book] is a tour de force, with analysis of the trial transcripts, the medical literature on sudden infant death syndrome, and the media coverage of the trial. What really impressed me about this book Is the depth and meticulousness of Emma's research… she is a methodical and careful scholar who combs the transcript and the literature for the ambiguities in the evidence and the testimony.
Emma's book has much to teach police investigators, lawyers, judges, and the medical profession about how subtle, yet compelling, gender ideologies are to the detriment of mothers.
[The book] makes invaluable contributions to legal knowledge, advocacy, and method, not the least of which is the book's use of trial transcripts to explore the construction of guilt by police, lawyers, experts, lay witnesses, judges, and the media. Emma's work is foundational for those legal scholars working with, and thinking about, transcripts… I am tremendously inspired by her book.
Elizabeth Sheehy and Christine Boyle, Canadian Journal of Women and the Law
While this book arose from Cunliffe's doctoral dissertation, its application is far beyond legal studies. This is largely because she so aptly followed the tenets of sound case study research, which involved the analysis of various sources of data...and sources of literature...The text is comprehensive, inter-disciplinary, incredibly well researched, and logically persuasive. As such, it will be attractive to several audiences, including legal scholars and law students (especially those aspiring towards criminal litigation); criminologists, sociologists and political scientists; as well as perhaps health/medical professionals and gender/women's studies scholars.
Angela M Moe, Theoretical Criminology
Whilst certainly presenting a compelling argument, Cunliffe writes in very measured tones, taking care not to romanticize or victimize Folbigg, but rather highlighting the precarious nature of her conviction. She sensibly makes no glib statements as to Kathleen's innocence but rather very honestly reflects that she was wrongly convicted, as despite several appeals there remains too much uncertainty to draw firm conclusions – particularly conclusions that are 'beyond reasonable doubt', in order to justify the denial of liberty.
...the aim of the book is not necessarily to resolve all of the aforementioned issues but rather to highlight, discuss and deconstruct them. It satisfyingly draws all of the themes together serving as a stark warning against the oversimplification of science in law, and also a remainder that science is not an infallible source of truth.
Sarah Singh, Social & Legal Studies
Cunliffe's book offers an important and original contribution to discourses on wrongful conviction and the dynamics of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
...the book is well written and moves effortlessly
