Negotiating Transitional Justice: Firsthand Lessons from Colombia and Beyond

The recent Colombian peace negotiations took the art and science of negotiating transitional justice to unprecedented levels of complexity. For decades, the Colombian government fought a bitter war against FARC guerrilla forces. After protracted negotiations, the two parties reached a peace deal that took account of the rights of victims. As first-hand participants in the talks, and principal advisers to the Colombia government, Mark Freeman and Iván Orozco offer a unique account of the mechanics through which accountability issues were addressed. Their many years working as scholars of war and transnational justice are brought to bear on their analysis of the decision to ensure transitional justice as part of the final deal. Drawing from this case study and other global experiences, Freeman and Orozco offer a comprehensive theoretical and practical conception of what makes the 'devil's dilemma' of negotiating peace with justice implausible but feasible.

• Offers a general theoretical framework on the choices and challenges of negotiating transitional justice as part of a larger peace or political settlement
• Includes a first-hand account of the way transitional justice was negotiated in the Colombian peace talks with the FARC
• Provides a collection of political and philosophical essays on the place of victims and justice in a contemporary negotiation similar to the one in Colombia