Preventing and Resolving Conflicts of Jurisdiction in EU Criminal Law

PART I: A European Law Institute Instrument, Katalin Ligeti, John Vervaele and André Klip (ELI Reporters)
Preface to Part I, Frank Meyer
Draft Legislative Proposals for the prevention and resolution of conflicts of jurisdiction in criminal matters in the European Union
PART II: Preventing and Resolving Conflicts of Jurisdiction in EU Criminal Law, Edited by Katalin Ligeti and Gavin Robinson
Preface to Part II, Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque
Introduction to the Articles, Katalin Ligeti and Gavin Robinson
1: Report on the Field Research at Eurojust, February 2015, Angelo Marletta
2: The legal basis for preventing and resolving conflicts of criminal jurisdiction in the TFEU, Martin Wasmeier
3: Prevention and settlement of conflicts of jurisdiction (Spanish system), Miguel Carmona Ruano
4: Forum choice in the area of freedom, security and justice, Angelo Marletta
5: Fundamental rights protection between Strasbourg and Luxembourg: Extending transnational ne bis in idem across administrative and criminal procedures, Katalin Ligeti
6: Choice of forum and cybercrime, Gavin Robinson
7: Conflicts of jurisdiction in criminal law: Lessons from European civil procedure, Pietro Ortolani
8: Mutual recognition, choice of forum, and lis pendens: A civil law threesome transposed, Aukje van Hoek
9: Choice of forum, European citizenship, and fundamental rights: The position of the defendant, Michiel Luchtman
10: What role for crime victims in the forum choice?, Michele Simonato
11: Choice of forum and case allocation in the EPPO Regulation, Hans- Holger Herrnfeld