Home >
Law >
Securities >
Property in Securities

Property in Securities A Comparative Study

Author: Eva Micheler
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 9780521832656
Published In: June 2007
Format: Hardback
Jurisdiction: U.K. ? Disclaimer:
Countri(es) stated herein are used as reference only

Out of stock

Description
Contents

Details
Micheler analyses the German, Austrian and English law of securities, addressing the rules governing transfers of securities, including unauthorised transfers, equities arising out of defective issues, and the holding of securities through intermediaries. The book presents an account of the current English, German and Austrian regimes. It has been written with a view to explaining the German and Austrian regime to readers with a common law background and to explaining the English regime to readers with a civil law background.
Micheler also aims to determine whether globalisation will cause the two different approaches to converge. It concludes that the respective rules in all three jurisdictions have historically evolved consistently with incumbent legal doctrine. This pattern of change is likely to continue. Convergence will occur on a functional rather than doctrinal level. Moreover, recent reform initiatives advanced by the UNIDROIT and the EU will lead to functional rather than doctrinal convergence.
- Contains an analysis of the civil and the common law approach to property in securities
- Analyses the prospect for law reform at a European or global level
- Contributes to the discussion as to whether legal systems are converging or developing in a path dependent manner
Contents:
Part I. Introduction:
1. Convergence and Path-Dependence; Part II. English Law:
2. Paper Transfers;
3. Dematerialisation;
4. Impact on the institutional framework;
5. Defective issues;
6. Unauthorised transfers;
7. Indirect holdings;
8. Conclusions; Part III. German and Austrian Law:
9. Historic starting point;
10. Paper transfers;
11. Impact on the institutional framework;
12. Immobilisation and its legal analysis;
13. Evidence of convergence?;
14. Conclusions; Part IV. Conclusions:
15. Legal development as a path dependent process;
16. Legal doctrine and market infrastructure;
17. Implications for convergence