Home >
Law >
Administrative / Constitutional Law >
Public Law Adjudication in Common Law Systems: Process and Substance

Public Law Adjudication in Common Law Systems: Process and Substance

Author: John Bell; Mark Elliott; Jason Varuhas; Philip Murray
Publisher: Hart Publishing
ISBN: 9781509924455
Published In: August 2018
Format: Paperback
Jurisdiction: U.K. ? Disclaimer:
Countri(es) stated herein are used as reference only

List Price: HKD 537.50

HKD 521.38 Save HKD 16.12 (3%)

Download Order Form

Add to Wishlist
| Add to Compare

Description
Contents

Details

This volume arises from the inaugural Public Law Conference hosted in September 2014 by the Centre for Public Law at the University of Cambridge.

This brought together leading public lawyers from different common law jurisdictions, providing for the first time a comparative analysis of process and substance in public law adjudication in common law systems. While those from common law jurisdictions share background understandings, significant differences between such systems create opportunities for valuable exchanges of ideas and debate.

The majority of the chapters consider topical issues in judicial review. Chapters adopting a theoretical perspective explore the trend towards conceptualising administrative law in terms of ‘public reason’; elaborate a values-based framework for analysing administrative law; and propound a public interest conception of public law.

Chapters adopting a contextual or empirical approach consider the impact of public law adjudication on government, and governmental responses to judicial decisions. Other chapters consider how procedure and substantive law have interacted historically in the field of judicial review. Concluding chapters reflect generally on the papers in the collection and the value of facilitating cross-jurisdictional dialogue.
1. Introduction John Bell, Mark Elliott, Jason NE Varuhas and Philip Murray
2. Public Reason and Administrative Legitimacy Jerry L Mashaw
3. Administrative Law: A Values-based Approach Paul Daly
4. The Public Interest Conception of Public Law: Its Procedural Origins and Substantive Implications Jason NE Varuhas
5. Process, Substance and the History of Error of Law Review Philip Murray
6. The Growth of Substantive Review: The Changes, their Causes and their Consequences Mark Aronson
7. 'Blasphemy Against Basics' : Doctrine, Conceptual Reasoning and Certain Decisions of the UK Supreme Court Christopher Forsyth
8. The Legitimacy of Expectations About Fairness: Can Process and Substance be Untangled? Matthew Groves and Greg Weeks
9. Judicial Review of Delegated Legislation: Why Favour Substantive Review over Procedural Review? Andrew Edgar
10. Transubstantiation in Canadian Public Law: Processing Substance and Instantiating Process Mary Liston
11. Is Judicial Review Qualitative? Alan Robertson
12. Remedies for Laws that Violate Human Rights Kent Roach
13. 'Striking Back' and 'Clamping Down': An Alternative Perspective on Judicial Review Carol Harlow and Richard Rawlings
14. The Use and Effects of Judicial Review: Assumptions and the Empirical Evidence Maurice Sunkin and Varda Bondy
15. Common Law Public Law: Some Comparative Reflections Cheryl Saunders
16. Comparison, Realism and Theory in Public Law David Feldman