|
Foreword
|
xv |
|
Acknowledgements
|
xviii |
|
Table of cases
|
xxi |
|
Table of treaties
|
xxxvii |
|
Select list of abbreviations
|
xli |
|
1 Introduction
|
1 |
|
A Introduction
|
1 |
|
B The book in outline
|
4 |
|
2 The wider legal framework of victim redress
|
9 |
|
A Introduction
|
9 |
|
B The invocation of responsibility
|
10 |
|
C The law relating to the treatment of aliens
|
11 |
|
D International human rights law
|
13 |
|
E International humanitarian law
|
18 |
|
1 International armed conflicts
|
18 |
|
2 Non-international armed conflicts
|
25 |
|
F National law and procedures
|
27 |
|
G Conclusion
|
31 |
|
3 Victim redress and international criminal justice: an overview
|
34 |
|
A Introduction
|
34 |
|
B Individual punishment and the traditional conception of international criminal justice
|
36 |
|
1 The position of victims within the classical framework of international law
|
37 |
|
2 Victims and the genesis of international criminal law
|
41 |
|
3 The conventional position of victims in international criminal law
|
43 |
|
C The development of the Rome Statute’s scheme of victim redress
|
48 |
|
D A principled role for victim redress as part of the system of international criminal justice?
|
54 |
|
1 The conceptual role of victim redress in international criminal law as a form of criminal justice
|
55 |
|
(a) The irrelevance of retributivism
|
55 |
|
(b) The insufficiency of restorative justice as a principled justification
|
56 |
|
(c) An expressivist account of victim redress: the role of vindicative satisfaction and moral denunciation
|
60 |
|
2 Victim redress and the prosecution and punishment of individuals: competing or compatible paradigms?
|
64 |
|
E Between ideals and reality: the potential disjuncture between the theory and practice of victim redress
|
67 |
|
F Conclusion
|
72 |
|
4 The concepts of reparations and victim support under the Rome Statute
|
75 |
|
A Introduction
|
75 |
|
B The concept of reparations under the Rome Statute
|
76 |
|
C The concept of victim support under the Rome Statute
|
84 |
|
1 The distinction between ‘reparations’ awarded under Article 75 and victim support provided pursuant to Rule 98(5)
|
85 |
|
2 The key features of the concept of victim support under the Statute
|
88 |
|
D Conclusion
|
92 |
|
5 The concept of harm under the Rome Statute
|
94 |
|
A Introduction
|
94 |
|
B Prefatory clarification
|
95 |
|
C An Autonomous Concept of Harm under the Rome Statute
|
98 |
|
D The forms of recoverable harm under the Rome Statute
|
100 |
|
1 Pecuniary loss
|
100 |
|
(a) Actualised pecuniary loss
|
101 |
|
(i) Damage to, or loss of, property
|
101 |
|
(b) Consequential pecuniary loss
|
104 |
|
(i) Loss of future earnings
|
105 |
|
(ii) Lost profit
|
106 |
|
(iii) Loss of support
|
106 |
|
(iv) Loss of pecuniary opportunity
|
108 |
|
(v) Medical, funeral and miscellaneous expenses
|
109 |
|
2 Non-pecuniary loss
|
110 |
|
(a) Death
|
110 |
|
(b) Personal injury
|
111 |
|
(i) Pain and suffering
|
113 |
|
(ii) Loss of amenities of life
|
119 |
|
(c) Loss of liberty
|
123 |
|
3 Communal harm
|
124 |
|
E Conclusion
|
127 |
|
6 Reparations principles
|
129 |
|
A Introduction
|
129 |
|
B The scope and parameters of the Court’s power to establish reparations principles
|
130 |
|
C The task of the Court in establishing reparations principles
|
132 |
|
D Determining the scope and extent of damage, loss and injury to victims
|
134 |
|
1 Causation
|
135 |
|
(a) Factual causation
|
137 |
|
(i) Determining the appropriate standard of factual causation
|
138 |
|
(ii) Determining the extent of a perpetrator’s contribution to the harm caused by a crime
|
145 |
|
(b) Legal causation
|
148 |
|
(i) Legal causation and Rule 85(a)
|
150 |
|
(ii) Legal causation and Rule 85(b)
|
153 |
|
(c) Conclusion
|
155 |
|
2 Determining the extent of a perpetrator’s liability where a state is concurrently responsible
|
156 |
|
3 Reparations awards where a perpetrator lacks the resources necessary to redress the harm he or she is found to have caused
|
157 |
|
E Modalities of reparations under the Rome Statute
|
158 |
|
1 Restitution
|
159 |
|
(a) The goal of restitutio in integrum
|
160 |
|
2 Compensation
|
162 |
|
(a) Compensable harm
|
163 |
|
(b) Quantum
|
163 |
|
3 Satisfaction
|
169 |
|
(a) Rehabilitation
|
170 |
|
(b) Declaration of wrongfulness
|
174 |
|
(c) Factual disclosure
|
177 |
|
(d) Contrition and acts of atonement
|
180 |
|
(e) Commemorations and memorials
|
181 |
|
F Conclusion
|
182 |
|
7 Proceedings and Court orders relevant to reparations
|
184 |
|
A Introduction
|
184 |
|
B The relationship between reparations and trial proceedings before the ICC
|
184 |
|
C Proceedings relating to reparations
|
190 |
|
1 The role of reparations hearings
|
190 |
|
2 The procedure for conducting reparations hearings
|
192 |
|
D Punitive orders
|
192 |
|
1 Fines under Article 77(2)(a)
|
193 |
|
2 Forfeiture of proceeds, property and assets pursuant to Article 77(2)(b)
|
194 |
|
(a) ‘forfeiture of proceeds, property and assets’
|
195 |
|
(b) ‘derived directly or indirectly from that crime’
|
199 |
|
(c) ‘without prejudice to the rights of bona fide third parties’
|
202 |
|
E Reparations orders
|
209 |
|
1 Restitution
|
213 |
|
2 Compensation
|
214 |
|
3 Rehabilitation
|
215 |
|
4 Other forms of order
|
216 |
|
F Powers of the Court in cases of contumacy
|
216 |
|
G Protective measures
|
217 |
|
H The burden and standard of proof in reparations and sentencing proceedings
|
219 |
|
1 Burden of proof
|
220 |
|
2 Standard of proof
|
221 |
|
I Conclusion
|
223 |
|
8 The provision of reparations and victim support through the Trust Fund
|
225 |
|
A Introduction
|
225 |
|
B The organisation and management of the Trust Fund
|
226 |
|
1 Relationship with the Assembly of States Parties
|
226 |
|
2 The Board of Directors
|
227 |
|
3 The Secretariat
|
228 |
|
4 The resources of the Trust Fund
|
229 |
|
C The prioritisation of resources by the Trust Fund
|
230 |
|
1 Prioritisation of resources by the Trust Fund in respect of Court-ordered reparations
|
230 |
|
2 Prioritisation of resources by the Trust Fund in respect of support to victims pursuant to Rule 98(5)
|
232 |
|
3 Criteria according to which resources for redress may be prioritised
|
234 |
|
(a) Prioritisation according to the vulnerability of victims
|
234 |
|
(b) Prioritisation according to the neediness of victims
|
235 |
|
(c) Prioritisation according to the nature of the unlawful act or the nature and/or gravity of harm inflicted
|
236 |
|
(d) Prioritisation in order to maximise the impact of limited resources
|
237 |
|
D Court-ordered reparations provided ‘through’ the Trust Fund
|
239 |
|
1 The extent of the Court’s role in directing and supervising the activities of the Trust Fund
|
240 |
|
(a) The apportionment of resources between Article 75 reparations and victim support pursuant to Rule 98(5)
|
241 |
|
(b) Judicial supervision and control of the implementation of Court-ordered reparations by the Trust Fund
|
242 |
|
(i) The design of Court-ordered reparations awards
|
243 |
|
(ii) Oversight of the implementation of the reparations award
|
248 |
|
2 Rule 98(2): The provision of reparations awards to individuals through the Trust Fund
|
252 |
|
3 Rule 98(3): The provision of collective reparations awards through the Trust Fund
|
253 |
|
4 The determination of claims for reparations by the Trust Fund
|
257 |
|
(a) Adjudication of claims by the Trust Fund
|
258 |
|
(i) The adjudicative process
|
261 |
|
(ii) Evidential issues
|
267 |
|
(b) Verification of the implementation of individual and collective reparations awards
|
275 |
|
5 Rule 98(4): The implementation of reparations awards by an intergovernmental, international or national organisation
|
276 |
|
(a) The procedure for engaging the assistance of an intermediary organisation
|
278 |
|
(b) The role and responsibilities of the intermediary organisation
|
279 |
|
(c) Monitoring and oversight of the implementation of reparations awards by intermediary organisations
|
281 |
|
E Victim support provided by the Trust Fund pursuant to Rule 98(5)
|
285 |
|
1 The power of the Trust Fund to use ‘other resources’ for the benefit of victims
|
286 |
|
(a) Determination by the Board of Directors as to the necessity of providing support pursuant to Rule 98(5)
|
286 |
|
(b) Notification of, and approval by, the Court of activities undertaken pursuant to Rule 98(5)
|
288 |
|
2 The activities of the Trust Fund undertaken pursuant to Rule 98(5)
|
293 |
|
(a) The form of activities undertaken pursuant to Rule 98(5)
|
293 |
|
(b) Procedures regulating how the ‘other resources’ of the Trust Fund are used
|
295 |
|
F Conclusion
|
296 |
|
9 Victim redress and the Rome Statute’s cooperation and enforcement regimes: possibilities and limitations
|
297 |
|
A Introduction
|
297 |
|
B The scope of the cooperation regime
|
298 |
|
1 The general powers of the Court and the Office of the Prosecutor
|
299 |
|
2 Reparations proceedings
|
300 |
|
3 The work of the Trust Fund in providing victim support
|
300 |
|
C States Parties and the cooperation regime
|
301 |
|
1 The scope of the general obligation to cooperate
|
303 |
|
2 Particularised forms of assistance the Court may request
|
303 |
|
(a) Tracing, seizure and freezing of assets by States Parties
|
304 |
|
(b) Other enumerated measures the Court may request of States Parties
|
306 |
|
(c) Relationship between Security Council sanctions and ICC cooperation requests
|
307 |
|
3 Other forms of assistance the Court may request of States Parties
|
308 |
|
D Cooperation and third states
|
309 |
|
1 Cooperation pursuant to the Statute
|
311 |
|
2 Cooperation pursuant to a Security Council resolution
|
311 |
|
E Intergovernmental organisations
|
313 |
|
1 The United Nations
|
314 |
|
2 Other organisations
|
315 |
|
F Cooperation in respect of individuals, armed groups and other non-state entities
|
317 |
|
G The enforcement of fines, punitive forfeiture and reparations orders
|
318 |
|
H Conclusion
|
321 |
|
10 Conclusions
|
324 |
|
A Introduction
|
324 |
|
B The role of victim redress as part of a system of international criminal justice
|
326 |
|
C The distinct role that the Rome Statute’s regime for victim redress can play alongside other international regimes
|
329 |
|
D The potential role of the Rome Statute’s regime of victim redress alongside national systems and processes
|
342 |
|
E Opportunities provided by the Rome Statute as an institutional framework within which to deal with questions of victim redress
|
346 |
|
F Between ideals and reality: challenges confronting the Rome Statute’s regime of victim redress
|
349 |
|
1 The limited resources available for victim redress
|
350 |
|
2 The selectivity of prosecutions under the Rome Statute
|
351 |
|
3 The risk of a fragmented and inappropriately individualised response to the harm suffered by victims
|
352 |
|
(a) The risk of a fragmented, uncoordinated response to the harm suffered by victims
|
353 |
|
(b) The risk of an inappropriately individualised approach to victim redress
|
354 |
|
(c) Ways in which the risks of fragmentation and individualisation can be offset
|
355 |
|
4 Difficulties associated with matters of victim redress being dealt with by an institution at the international level
|
356 |
|
G Conclusion
|
359 |
|
Select bibliography
|
361 |
|
Index
|
373 |