Home >
Law >
Others >
The Actual Art of Governing: Justice Robert H. Jackson's Concurring Opinion in the Steel Seizure Case

The Actual Art of Governing: Justice Robert H. Jackson's Concurring Opinion in the Steel Seizure Case

Author: Gerard N. Magliocca
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 9780197768532

Published In: October 2025
Format: Hardback
Jurisdiction: U.S. ? Disclaimer:
Countri(es) stated herein are used as reference only

HKD 428.00

Download Order Form

Add to Wishlist
| Add to Compare

Description
Contents

Details

Since the adoption of the US constitution, there has been ongoing calibration of the power balance between the three branches of government, often in the face of rapidly changing social and political contexts. In 1952, US Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson took up this debate in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. Sawyer, a watershed case that barred President Harry S. Truman from seizing privately operated steel mills during the Korean War. Concurring with the majority decision, Jackson penned an opinion that would become the authoritative source on the constitutional boundary between congressional and executive authority.

In The Actual Art of Governing, eminent legal historian Gerard N. Magliocca takes a close look at this landmark opinion, providing a deep reading of the decision and the context surrounding it, and explaining its lasting influence. Magliocca skillfully shows how Justice Jackson's opinion broke free of the rules for judicial writing, taking a pragmatic approach to constitutional interpretation that drew on personal experience and historical examples, rather than sticking strictly to the text, judicial doctrine, and original public meaning. The framework that Jackson proposed took on crucial significance during the fallout of Richard Nixon's Watergate abuses and has continued to be relied upon in controversies involving the reach of the US President's power, including actions taken by Donald Trump. Magliocca concludes by arguing that a proper reading of Jackson's Youngstown concurrence would lead to significant curbs on emergency powers, the discretion of the federal courts, and presidential authority.

Presents a fresh and comprehensive analysis of one of the most important opinions in constitutional law
Examines the limits of presidential power, an important and timely topic for American politics
Explores the possible trajectories for the future of jurisprudence about executive authority

Part 1: Elements

1. The Justice

2. The Case

3. The Opinion

4. Drafting Choices

Part 2: Themes

5. Personal Reflections

6. Relativity

7. Widest Latitude

8. Imponderables

9. Lowest Ebb

10. Commander in Chief