Home
Law
Criminal Law
The Legitimacy of EU Criminal Law

The Legitimacy of EU Criminal Law

Name: The Legitimacy of EU Criminal Law
Brand: Hart Publishing
SKU: 9781509919741
Price: 1261.00 HKD
Availability: InStock
Author: Irene Wieczorek
ISBN: 9781509919741

By Irene Wieczorek

Hart Publishing July 2020

Specifications

ISBN-13: 9781509919741
Publisher: Hart Publishing
Publication: July 2020
Format: Hardback
Jurisdiction: U.K. ? Countri(es) for reference only

Also available as

Paperback

Details

This book traces the history of the EU competence, EU policy discourse and EU legislation in the field of criminalisation from Maastricht until the present day. It asks “Why EU Criminal Law?” looking at what rationales the Treaty, policy document and legislation put forth when deciding a certain behaviour should be a criminal offence. It reads the EU approach to criminalisation relying on a modern and post-modern criminal legal theory framework, read jointly with the theories on the function of EU Harmonisation of national law. On these basis, it demonstrate that while EU constitutional law leans towards an effectiveness-based, enforcement-driven understanding of criminal law, the EU has in fact in more than one instance adopted symbolic EU criminal law, that is criminal law aimed at highlighting what values are important to the EU, but which is not fit to actually deter individuals from harming such values. It questions whether this approach is consistent or in contradiction with the values-based constitutional identity the EU has set for itself.

Introduction

I. The Emerging Debate on the Legitimacy of EU Criminal Law

II. How to Theorise on the Legitimacy of EU Criminal Law

III. The Practical Importance of (EU Criminal Law) Theory

IV. The Broader Reach of the Discussion on the Legitimacy of EU Criminal Law

1. Why Criminal Law? The Question of, and Models for, the Legitimacy of Criminal Law

I. Why is Criminal Law Special? A Consequence-Based Approach

II. The Need to Legitimate Criminalisation Choices

III. A (Liberal) Deontological Approach to the Legitimacy of Criminal Law

IV. A (Liberal) Utilitarian Approach to the Legitimacy of Criminal Law

V. A Joint Deontological-Utilitarian Approach to the Legitimacy of Criminal Law?

VI. The Doctrinal Character of the Debate on the Legitimacy of Criminal Law

VII. Conclusions

2. Why EU Criminal Law? The Question of, and the Models for, the Legitimacy of Supranational Criminal Law

I. Is the Debate on the Legitimacy of Criminal Law Relevant to the EU Legal Order?

II. What Do EU Constitutional Values and Principles Tell Us about the Legitimacy of EU Criminal Law?

III. Conclusions

3. Rationales for the Harmonisation and Legitimacy of EU Criminal Law

I. A Definition of Harmonisation as a Legal Process

II. Does Harmonisation Have an Inherent, Values-Based Dimension?

III. Harmonisation of National Criminal Law within the EU Legal Order

IV. The 'Values-Based' Criminalisation Rationale for Harmonisation: Deontological EU Criminal Law

V. The 'Justice', 'Free Movement' and 'Cooperation' Rationales for Harmonisation: Utilitarian EU Criminal Law

VI. The Socialising Rationale for Harmonisation: Utilitarian EU Criminal Law

VII. The 'Regulatory' Rationale for Harmonisation: Utilitarian EU Criminal Law

VIII. Conclusions

4. EU Competences on Securitised Criminalisation: From a Utilitarian to an Integrated Approach to EU Criminal Law

I. EU Criminalisation Competences: Securitised V Functional Criminalisation

II. A Utilitarian Legitimacy for EU Criminal Law under the Maastricht and Amsterdam Third Pillar

III. Integrated Legitimacy for EU Criminal Law under the Treaty of Lisbon

IV. Conclusions

5. EU Competences on Functional Criminalisation: The Route to Utilitarian EU Criminal Law

I. The Scope of EU Functional Criminalisation

II. The Early Case Law: Sanctioning Obligations and an Integrated Approach to Criminal Law

III. The Case Law in the 2000S: Criminalisation Obligations and an Integrated Approach to EU Criminal Law

IV. The Treaty of Lisbon: The Final (Utilitarian) Word

V. Conclusions

6. From Tampere to Stockholm: The Path towards Integrated Legitimacy

I. The Utilitarian Approach to Criminal Law in Pre-Lisbon Justice and Home Affairs Programmes

II. The Integrated Approach in the 2009 Stockholm Justice and Home Affairs Programme

III. The Silence in the 2014 Justice and Home Affairs Strategic Guidelines

IV. The EU Criminalisation Policy Documents: The Core of the Discussion

V. The Shift from a Utilitarian to an Integrated Approach in Policy Documents

VI. Conclusions

7. Legitimating EU Criminal Law in Practice: The Case of Racism and Xenophobia, Market Abuse and PIF Crimes

I. The Patchwork Structure of EU Criminal Law and the Choice of Case Studies

II. The 2008 Framework Decision on Racism and Xenophobia: Symbolic EU Criminal Law under Amsterdam

III. The 2014 Market Abuse Directive: Symbolic EU Criminal Law under Lisbon?

IV. The 2017 PIF Directive: An Integrated Legitimacy for EU Criminal Law?

V. Conclusions

8. Conclusions

I. The Long-Standing Doctrinal Debate on the Legitimacy of Criminal Law

II. The Relevance and Legal Dimensions of the Debate on the Legitimacy of EU Criminal Law

III. The EU Constitutional Values and Principles and the Legitimacy of EU Criminal Law

IV. The Specifics of the EU Criminalisation Process

V. The Main Argument of the Book: Symbolic EU Criminal Law in a Bureaucratic Criminal

Law Institutional Framework

VI. The Dangers of an Expansion of Non-legitimate EU Criminal Law

HKD 1,261.00 −3%

HKD 1,300.00

Inclusive of HK delivery

Ready to ship

Quantity

Delivery Time: around 4-5 weeks

Extra 10 working days if shipping address outside Hong Kong

Free HK shipping over HK$1,000
International shipping to 35+ countries

Order Form

Save

Recommended

Your basket

The Legitimacy of EU Criminal Law

Details

Table of Contents

You may also be interested in these books:

Policing the Crowd

Criminal Law, 5th Edition

Sentencing Principles, Procedure and Practice 2024

Sexual Offences

The Drugs Offences Handbook

Head of State Immunity under the Malabo Protocol: Triumph of Impunity over Accountability?