Three Liability Regimes for Artificial Intelligence: Algorithmic Actants, Hybrids, Crowds

Author: Anna Beckers; Gunther Teubner
Publisher: Hart Publishing
ISBN: 9781509949373

Published In: June 2023
Format: Paperback
Jurisdiction: U.K. ? Disclaimer:
Countri(es) stated herein are used as reference only
Hardback Edition ISBN: 9781509949335

List Price: HKD 571.87

HKD 554.71 Save HKD 17.16 (3%)

Download Order Form

Add to Wishlist
| Add to Compare

Description
Contents

Details

This book proposes three liability regimes to combat the wide responsibility gap caused by AI systems – vicarious liability for autonomous software agents (actants); enterprise liability for inseparable human-AI interactions (hybrids); and collective fund liability for interconnected AI systems (crowds).

Based on information technology studies, the book first develops a threefold typology that distinguishes individual, hybrid and collective machine behaviour. A subsequent social sciences analysis specifies the socio-technical configurations of this threefold typology and theorises their social risks when being used in social practices: actants raise the risk of digital autonomy, hybrids the risk of double contingency, crowds the risk of opaque interconnections. The book demonstrates that it is these specific risks to which the law needs to respond, by recognising personified algorithms as vicarious agents, human-machine associations as collective enterprises, and interconnected systems as risk pools – and by developing corresponding liability rules.

The book relies on a unique combination of information technology studies, sociological configuration and risk analysis, and comparative law. This unique approach uncovers recursive relations between types of machine behaviour, emergent socio-technical configurations, their concomitant risks, the legal conditions of liability rules, and the ascription of legal status to the algorithms involved.

1. Digitalisation: The Responsibility Gap

I. The Fear of the Homo Ex Machina

II. Growing Liability Gaps

III. Legal Doctrine and the Denial of Reality

IV. Full Legal Subjectivity for E-Persons?

V. Our Solution: New Legal Status Ascriptions for Autonomous Information Systems

VI. Three Digital Risks and Their Legal Conceptualisation

2. Actants: Autonomy Risk

I. Anthropomorphism?

II. Communication with Actants

III. Gradualised Digital Autonomy

IV. Legal Criteria of Autonomy