Home >
Law >
Administrative / Constitutional Law >
Vagueness and Law: Philosophical and Legal Perspectives

Vagueness and Law: Philosophical and Legal Perspectives

Author: Geert Keil; Ralf Poscher
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 9780198782889
Published In: December 2016
Format: Hardback
Jurisdiction: U.K. ? Disclaimer:
Countri(es) stated herein are used as reference only

List Price: HKD 1,332.50

HKD 1,292.53 Save HKD 39.97 (3%)

Download Order Form

Add to Wishlist
| Add to Compare

Description
Contents

Details

Vague expressions are omnipresent in natural language. As such, their use in legal texts is virtually inevitable. If a law contains vague terms, the question whether it applies to a particular case often lacks a clear answer.

One of the fundamental pillars of the rule of law is legal certainty. The determinacy of the law enables people to use it as a guide and places judges in the position to decide impartially. Vagueness poses a threat to these ideals.

In borderline cases, the law seems to be indeterminate and thus incapable of serving its core rule of law value. In the philosophy of language, vagueness has become one of the hottest topics of the last two decades. Linguists and philosophers have investigated what distinguishes "soritical" vagueness from other kinds of linguistic indeterminacy, such as ambiguity, generality, open texture, and family resemblance concepts.

There is a vast literature that discusses the logical, semantic, pragmatic, and epistemic aspects of these phenomena.

Legal theory has hitherto paid little attention to the differences between the various kinds of linguistic indeterminacy that are grouped under the heading of "vagueness", let alone to the various theories that try to account for these phenomena.

Bringing together leading scholars working on the topic of vagueness in philosophy and in law, this book fosters a dialogue between philosophers and legal scholars by examining how philosophers conceive vagueness in law from their theoretical perspective and how legal theorists make use of philosophical theories of vagueness. The chapters of the book are organized into three parts.

The first part addresses the import of different theories of vagueness for the law, referring to a wide range of theories from supervaluationist to contextualist and semantic realist accounts in order to address the question of whether the law can learn from engaging with philosophical discussions of vagueness. The second part of the book examines different vagueness phenomena.

The contributions in part 2 suggest that the greater awareness to different vagueness phenomena can make lawyers aware of specific issues and solutions so far overlooked. The third part deals with the pragmatic aspects of vagueness in law, providing answers to the question of how to deal with vagueness in law and with the professional, political, moral, and ethical issues such vagueness gives rise to.

Introduction Ralf Poscher and Geert Kei

Part I: Theories of Vagueness and Their Impact on Jurisprudence

1: Stephen Schiffer: Philosophical and Jurisprudential Issues of Vagueness

2: Diana Raffman: Vagueness in Law: Placing the Blame Where It's Due

3: Ralf Poscher: An Intentionalist Account of Vagueness: A Legal Perspective

4: Hrafn Asgeirsson: Can Legal Practice Adjudicate Between Theories of Vagueness?

5: Michael S. Moore: Semantics, Metaphysics, and Objectivity in the Law

Part II: Vagueness Phenomena in Law

6: Andrei Marmor: Pragmatic Vagueness in Statutory Law

7: Frederick Schauer: Second-Order Vagueness in the Law

8: Marc Andree Weber: The Non-Conservativeness of Legal Definitions

9: Nikola Kompa: The Role of Vagueness and Context Sensitivity in Legal Interpretation