|
Foreword
|
page xv
|
|
Preface
|
xvii
|
|
Table of Conventions
|
xix
|
|
Table of European Union Instruments
|
xxiv
|
|
Table of IMO Resolutions and Guidelines
|
xxvi
|
|
Table of Miscellaneous Instruments
|
xxix
|
|
Table of Domestic Legislation
|
xxx
|
|
Table of Cases (International Courts and Tribunals)
|
xxxi
|
|
Abbreviations
|
xxxii
|
|
Part
|
A
|
The Regulation of Vessel-Source Pollution in its Eco-Political Context
|
|
1
|
Vessel-Source Pollution, the Ecological Imperative and the Compliance Problem
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
Overview
|
3
|
|
|
2
|
Regulating the Sources of Marine Pollution
|
10
|
|
|
3
|
Whither the Freedom of Navigation?
|
17
|
|
|
4
|
Technical Issues and Jurisdiction over Ships
|
19
|
|
|
5
|
Outline of Analysis
|
25
|
|
2
|
The Dynamics of the Law-Making Process: Actors, Arenas and Interests
|
29
|
|
|
1
|
Overview
|
29
|
|
|
2
|
Key Actors in the Decision-Making Process
|
34
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
The Maritime Interests
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
2.1.1
|
The Shipowners and Operators
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
2.1.2
|
The Cargo Owners and Charterers
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
2.1.3
|
The Protection and Indemnity (P&I) Clubs and the Marine Insurers
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
2.1.4
|
The Classification Societies
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
2.1.5
|
The Military Interests
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
2.1.6
|
The Flag States and Open Registries
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
2.1.7
|
States with Maritime Interests
|
62
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
The Coastal/Environmental Interests
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
2.2.1
|
The Environmental Non-Governmental Organisations
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
2.2.2
|
Public Opinion and Media Reaction
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
2.2.3
|
States with Coastal Interests
|
71
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
The Developing Countries
|
73
|
|
|
3
|
Major Arenas for Decision-Making
|
75
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
International Fora: The International Maritime Organization (IMO)
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
3.1.1
|
IMO’s Initial Years
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
3.1.2
|
The Constitutive Structure of IMO
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
3.1.3
|
IMO and Maritime Conventions
|
77
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
International Fora – United Nations Bodies and Specialised Agencies
|
80
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
Regional Fora
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
3.3.1
|
Legal and Political Developments in Europe
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
3.3.2
|
Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) on Port State Control
|
90
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
Domestic Fora – Agitation Within States
|
94
|
|
|
4
|
Marine Pollution Regulation and the Interplay of Interests
|
98
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
The Relative Capacities of the Relevant Actors
|
98
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
The Contemporary Political Dynamics at IMO
|
102
|
|
Part
|
B
|
Vessel-Source Pollution and the International Legislative Process
|
|
3
|
Vessel-Source Pollution and Regime Formation
|
107
|
|
|
1
|
Pollution Control Standards and Reception Facilities
|
107
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
Early Regulatory Efforts
|
107
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
The OILPOL Regime and the Load-On-Top (LOT) System
|
110
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
MARPOL 73
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
1.3.1
|
Annex I and Segregated Ballast Tanks (SBTs)
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
1.3.2
|
Annexes II to V
|
132
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
MARPOL 73/78 and Crude Oil Washing (COW)
|
133
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
The Double Hull Requirement
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
1.5.1
|
The Exxon Valdez and the 1992 Amendments
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
1.5.2
|
The Erika and the 2001 Amendments
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
1.5.3
|
The Prestige and the 2003 Amendments
|
150
|
|
|
2
|
Air Pollution from Ships
|
155
|
|
|
3
|
Anti-Fouling Systems and Tributyl Tin (TBT) Contamination
|
162
|
|
|
4
|
Harmful Aquatic Organisms and Ballast Water Management
|
169
|
|
|
5
|
Conclusion
|
174
|
|
4
|
Jurisdiction over Vessel-Source Marine Pollution
|
176
|
|
|
1
|
The Concept of ‘Jurisdiction’ in Marine Pollution
|
176
|
|
|
2
|
Early Attempts to Extend Coastal State Jurisdiction
|
181
|
|
|
3
|
Jurisdiction under the MARPOL Regime
|
184
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
Prescriptive Jurisdiction under MARPOL 73
|
184
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
Enforcement Jurisdiction under MARPOL 73
|
187
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
The 1978 MARPOL Protocol
|
191
|
|
|
4
|
The 1982 UN Conference on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS III)
|
192
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
The Law of the Sea Convention (LOSC) and Part XII on the Marine Environment
|
192
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
The Allocation of State Jurisdiction under the LOSC
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
4.2.1
|
Flag State Jurisdiction
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
4.2.2
|
Coastal State Jurisdiction
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
4.2.3
|
Port State Jurisdiction
|
217
|
|
|
5
|
Conclusion
|
222
|
|
5
|
Implementation and Compliance
|
230
|
|
|
1
|
Overview
|
230
|
|
|
2
|
Ratification, Incorporation into Domestic Law and Implementation
|
232
|
|
|
3
|
The Enforcement Obligations of States
|
236
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
Pollution Control Standards and State Enforcement Records
|
236
|
|
|
|
|
3.1.1
|
Discharge vs. Equipment Standards
|
236
|
|
|
|
|
3.1.2
|
State Enforcement of Pollution Control Standards
|
239
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
The Provision of Waste Reception Facilities in Ports
|
251
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
Reporting on Implementation Activities
|
269
|
|
|
|
|
3.3.1
|
Reporting on the Provision of Reception Facilities
|
269
|
|
|
|
|
3.3.2
|
Reporting on Enforcement Action
|
273
|
|
|
4
|
Conclusion
|
282
|
|
6
|
Liability and Compensation
|
286
|
|
|
1
|
Overview
|
286
|
|
|
2
|
The 1969 Civil Liability Convention (CLC 69)
|
288
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
Developments Preceding CLC 69
|
288
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
The 1969 Brussels Conference
|
293
|
|
|
3
|
The 1971 Fund Convention (FUND 71)
|
300
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
Developments Preceding FUND 71
|
300
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
The 1971 FUND Conference
|
302
|
|
|
4
|
Amendments to TOVALOP/CRISTAL and CLC/FUND
|
309
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
Revising the Industry Initiatives
|
309
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
Developments Preceding the 1984 Conference
|
311
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
The 1984 IMO Conference
|
313
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
Further Revision of TOVALOP and CRISTAL
|
315
|
|
|
5
|
Liability and Compensation in the United States
|
318
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
The Exxon Valdez and Developments Preceding OPA-90
|
318
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
Implications of OPA-90
|
322
|
|
|
6
|
The 1992 Protocols to the CLC and FUND Conventions
|
327
|
|
|
7
|
Pollution by Hazardous and Noxious Substances (HNS)
|
334
|
|
|
8
|
Pollution by Bunker Fuel Oils
|
339
|
|
|
9
|
The Liability and Compensation Regimes: Concluding Analysis
|
342
|
|
Part
|
C
|
The Future of Regulation
|
|
|
7
|
Challenges and Prescriptions
|
347
|
|
|
1
|
Improving Institutional Responses
|
347
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
Pro-active Rule-Making by IMO
|
348
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
Prompt Entry into Force for Conventions
|
351
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
Ensuring Effective Enforcement and Compliance
|
355
|
|
|
|
|
1.3.1
|
Market Discrimination Against Sub-standard Shipping
|
356
|
|
|
|
|
1.3.2
|
Liability of Non-Owner Interests
|
358
|
|
|
|
|
1.3.3
|
Return of the Developed State Flags
|
363
|
|
|
|
|
1.3.4
|
Tightening Flag State Obligations
|
365
|
|
|
|
|
1.3.5
|
Enhancing Port State Control
|
367
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
Enforcement Powers for IMO
|
369
|
|
|
2
|
Enhancing Equity in Representation and Responsibilities
|
373
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
Reforming IMO
|
374
|
|
|
|
|
2.1.1
|
Institutional and Financial Equity
|
374
|
|
|
|
|
2.1.2
|
Discipline in Agenda-Setting
|
376
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
States and the Provision of Reception Facilities
|
378
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
The Cargo Interests and Burden-Sharing
|
379
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
Shipowners and Intra-Industry Co-operation
|
381
|
|
|
3
|
Final Thoughts
|
383
|
|
Bibliography
|
385
|
|
Index
|
404
|