Home >
Law >
Business / Commercial Law >
The Constitutionalization of the World Trade Organization

The Constitutionalization of the World Trade Organization

Author: Deborah Z. Cass
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 9780199285846
Published In: August 2005
Format: Paperback , 296 pages
Jurisdiction: International ? Disclaimer:
Countri(es) stated herein are used as reference only

Out of stock

Description
Author
Reviews

Details

Offers a forensic analysis of the international trade 'constitutionalization project'
Acknowledges the powerful and insistent claims of legitimacy, democracy, and community
Offers a fresh explanation of the present preoccupations of the WTO agenda
Uses a broad cross-disciplinary analysis including international relations, and globalization and governance studies

This is a book about the constitutionalization of the World Trade Organization, and the contemporary development of institutional forms and democratic ideas associated with constitutionalism within the world trading system.

It is about constitutionalization enthusiasts who promote institutions, management techniques, rights discourse and quasi-judicial power to construct a constitution for the WTO. It is about constitutional skeptics who fear the effect the phenomenon of constitutionalization is having on the autonomy of states, the capacity of the WTO to consider non-economic and non-free-trade goals, and democratic processes at the WTO and within the nation-state.

The aim of the study, then, is to disentangle debates about the various meanings of the term 'constitution' when it used to apply to the World Trade Organization, and to reflect upon the significance of those meanings for more general international law conceptions of constitutions.

Cass argues that the WTO is not and should not be described as a constitution, either by the standards of any received account of that term, or by the lights of any of the current WTO models. Under these definitions serious issues of legitimacy, democracy and community are at stake. The WTO would lack a proper political structure to balance the work of its judicial bodies; it may curtail the ability of states to decide matters of national economic interest; it lacks authorization by a coherent political community; and, it risks an emphasis upon economic goals and pure free trade over other, equally important, social values.

Instead, Cass argues that what is needed is a constitutionalized WTO which considers the economic development needs of states and takes account of the skewed playing field of international trade and its effect on the economic prospects of developing countries. In short, trading democracy, legitimacy and community and not trading constitutionalization, are the biggest challenges facing the WTO.

Readership: WTO specialists; international lawyers, constitutionalists, international relations, international trade and economic relations students and policy makers.

Deborah Z. Cass, Reader in Law, London School of Economics and Political Science

"'Deborah Cass has achieved that rare thing: An account which is sophisticated at both a theoretical and a doctrinal level. Her book will be a benchmark for all future writing on this theme.'" - Joanne Scott, University of Cambridge

"'This extraordinary book probes the frontier of international economic law'" - From the Preface by Professor John Jackson, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.

"'Can or should global governance be guided by constitutional ideals and aspirations? What does democracy mean beyond the nation-state? Cass's book addresses these crucial issues by a careful examination of the debate over the legitimacy of the World Trade Organization. A fine legal scholar whose analysis is grounded in doctrine and jurisprudence but who also has very good interdisciplinary intuitions, Cass builds important bridges between political philosophy and international law. Even those who disagree with her conclusions about democracy and global constitutionalism will find that this work clarifies and enriches their own thinking.'" - Professor Robert Howse, University of Michigan