Home >
Law >
Administrative / Constitutional Law >
Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design: Moral and Empirical Reasoning in Judicial Review

Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design: Moral and Empirical Reasoning in Judicial Review

Author: Paul Yowell
Publisher: Hart Publishing
ISBN: 9781509913596

Published In: April 2018
Format: Hardback
Jurisdiction: U.K. ? Disclaimer:
Countri(es) stated herein are used as reference only
Paperback Edition ISBN: 9781509940301

List Price: HKD 1,170.00

HKD 1,134.90 Save HKD 35.10 (3%)

Download Order Form

Add to Wishlist
| Add to Compare

Description
Contents

Details

Constitutional courts around the world increasingly rely on empirical and moral reasoning in judicial review of legislation.

The abstract language of bills of rights and the proportionality inquiry invite the use of non-legal sources to resolve cases about constitutional rights, which address the most controversial issues of our day: data privacy, anti-terrorism laws, assisted suicide, marriage, abortion, and more. Judges review social science research to assess whether a law will effectively achieve its aim, and at what cost to other interests, citing studies and statistical information from psychology, sociology, and medicine, and other disciplines.

This empirical reasoning proceeds alongside moral reasoning regarding values such as equality, liberty, and autonomy, determining what they require in concrete circumstances.

This book shows that courts were not designed for this kind of moral and empirical reasoning, and generally lack the institutional capacities needed to do it well. The crux of the problem is the entrenched nature of constitutional decisions. A judgment that annuls legislation or establishes a new right is, in principle, permanent.

Moral and factual errors made by constitutional courts are not subject to the correcting mechanisms of ordinary political and legislative processes. The book concludes with practical proposals to address the deficit in the institutional capacities of courts, and to ameliorate the entrenchment effect of constitutional decisions.

1. Introduction

I. Removing the Blindfold

II. Scope of the Argument

III. Recovering Montesquieu

2. The Adjudication of Constitutional Rights

I. Constitutional Rights and Ordinary Legal Rights

II. Proportionality in Practice

III. Proportionality in the US?

IV. Absolute and Prima Facie Rights

V. Rights, Proportionality and Utilitarianism

VI. Rights as Interests

VII. Moral and Empirical Reasoning