Home >
Law >
Antitrust / Competition Law >
Exclusionary Abuse after the Post Denmark I Case

Exclusionary Abuse after the Post Denmark I Case The Role of the Effects-Based Approach under Article 102 TFEU

Author: Anders Jessen
Publisher: Kluwer Law International
ISBN: 9789041189967
Published In: July 2017
Format: Hardback
Jurisdiction: International ? Disclaimer:
Countri(es) stated herein are used as reference only

List Price: RMB 1,398.19

RMB 1,356.24 Save RMB 41.95 (3%)

Download Order Form

Add to Wishlist
| Add to Compare

Description
Contents
Author

Details

Exclusionary Abuse after the Post Danmark I Case presents an in-depth analysis of the limited case law, soft law, and theory in the field of law and economics, confronting the complex issues raised by the effects-based approach used to determine whether competition law has been breached and clarifying how this approach can best be applied in future cases. According to Article 102 TFEU (Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union), a firm holding a dominant position in its market is not allowed to abuse this dominant market power through unilateral conduct. Although this provision is clearly of great importance in curbing the adverse effects of market power, it remains far from clear when dominant firms’ exclusionary conduct is in breach of this provision.

What’s in this book:

Among the issues and topics covered are the following:

relevant case law, notably Post Danmark I, Tomra, and Intel;
analyses and discussions of when and how to apply the effect-based approach, including by object restrictions;
economic theories in the context of Article 102 TFEU; and
predation versus exclusion.

While the book is grounded in the legal framework, it also applies a law- and economics-based approach with the aim of supporting the legal arguments and conclusions and thereby providing more robust arguments for the reached conclusions.

How this will help you:

As the first study to offer a much-needed clarification of the assessment relating to exclusionary conduct within Article 102 TFEU after the Post Danmark I case, this book provides suggestions on how to structure the approach, thus creating greater legal certainty for dominant firms (and their competitors) and providing a sound basis for both practice and research in this area. It is sure to be read and studied widely by practitioners and academics concerned with the application of Article 102 TFEU.

Features

Thorough guidance on exclusionary abuse by dominant firms within Article 102 TFEU, including the importance of anti-competitive effects.
Comprehensive analysis of when the effect-based approach is to be applied and how a distinction between by object and by effect restrictions exists.
Extensive treatment of how to apply the effect-based approach.

Benefits

Proceed confidently through the uncertainties that surround exclusionary abuse after especially the Post Danmark I case.
Approach any case, compliance program or the like dealing with exclusionary abuse with full awareness of when exclusionary conduct can constitute abuse.
Navigate confidently through the EU Courts case law on exclusionary abuse.
Knowledge of when to apply the effect-based and how to apply it.

Chapter 1 Introduction

Part I The Framework

CHAPTER 2 The Purpose of Article 102 TFEU

CHAPTER 3 Defining Anti-competitive Foreclosure Effects

Part II Research Question No. 1

Chapter 4 By Object Restrictions Within Article 102 TFEU

Part III Research Question No. 2 :

Chapter 5 Predation Versus Exclusion

Chapter 6 Predation

Chapter 7 Exclusion

Part IV Conclusions and Discussions

Chapter 8 Final Remarks

Bibliography

Table of Cases

Table of Legislation

Index

Anders Fløjstrup Jessen’s interests lies within law and economics particularly in relation to EU competition law. He recently completed a three-year Industrial PhD project in cooperation with Aarhus University and Bech-Bruun law firm. At Bech-Bruun, he advised firms on cases and compliance programmes regarding competition law, alongside writing a PhD at Aarhus University revolving around Article 102 TFEU. Prior to this, he graduated from Aarhus University with a Master’s in Business Administration and Commercial Law.