Details
- A riveting account of homicide law reform
- Tackles deep and important questions of how murder and killing are, and should be, defined
- Enables deeper understanding of law reform, and who should be responsible for making and reforming the laws
- Offers a unique insider's view on both homicide and law reform, drawn from the author's experience as Law Commissioner responsible for criminal law
What makes murder, murder? How should we understand the difference between intentional and reckless killing? Should offenders be punished differently according to the perceived severity of their crime and when should they be excused?
These questions are the topic of intense debate within legal circles and beyond in the UK, the US, and the rest of world. Jeremy Horder's role as the Law Commissioner for England and Wales on criminal law has given him unique insight into these questions and the debates surrounding them. Here he analyses the recent political and legal reform movements, offering a political history of homicide law reform from the 19th century to the modern era.
Using homicide as a starting point, Horder raises deeper questions of who is and should be responsible for making and changing the law. What role should there be for expert bodies, judges, and politicians? What role should there be for the general public? These questions invoke strong emotional responses. Horder argues that comprehensive research into, and a degree of difference to, public opinion on the scope of homicide is essential to the reform process. It is essential principally as a means of conferring true legitimacy on homicide reform in a democracy. Elite or expert opinion alone will never authentically secure such legitimacy. Offering an insider's view into the processes of achieving law reform, Horder expresses criticism of a system that excludes the vast majority of people from consultation on reform of the laws that govern them.
Readership: Academics, postgraduate students, and undergraduate students in criminal law, criminology, and criminal justice; academics and postgraduate students in legal and political theory, government, sociology or social policy; criminal law and criminal justice practitioners
Introduction
Part One: Homicide law Reform and Law Reformers: The English Experience
1: Safe in Whose Hands? Judges, Experts, and Public Opinion in the Homicide Reform Process
2: The Rise of Regulation and the Fate of the Common Law
Part Two: Homicide Offences: Disputing the Boundaries
3: On Being Morally and Legally Speaking, a 'Murderer'
4: Corporate Manslaughter and Public Authorities
5: Violating Physical Integrity: Manslaughter by Intentional Attack
6: Joint Criminal Ventures and Murder
7: Transferred Malice and the Remoteness of Outcomes from Intentions
Part Three: Defences to Murder
8: Wrong Turnings on Defences to Murder
Bibliography
Jeremy Horder, Edmund-Davies Professor of Criminal Law, King's College London
Jeremy Horder is Edmund-Davies Professor of Criminal Law at King's College London, and a door tenant at 25 Bedford Row. He is an Honorary Bencher of the Middle Temple, and an Emeritus Fellow of Worcester College, Oxford. He was a Law Commissioner for England and Wales from 2005-2010. His previous books with OUP include Provocation and Responsibility (1992) and Excusing Crime (2004).
"[A] fascinating monograph that challenges many received ideas and tendencies, and puts forward a nuanced view of the forces that should ideally operate to shape the law of homicide." - Andrew Ashworth (from the preface)
